UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant  x

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  o

 

Check the appropriate box:

ox

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

xo

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

Definitive Additional Materials

o

Soliciting Material Pursuant tounder §240.14a-12

 

SEI INSTITUTIONAL MANAGED TRUST

SEI INSTITUTIONAL INTERNATIONAL TRUST

SEI INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS TRUST

SEI TAX EXEMPT TRUST

SEI DAILY INCOME TRUST

SEI ASSET ALLOCATION TRUST

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x

No fee required.

o

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

 

 

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

 

 

(5)

Total fee paid:

 

 

 

o

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

 

 

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

 

 

(3)

Filing Party:

 

 

 

 

(4)

Date Filed:

 

 

 

 



SEI INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS TRUSTFUNDS

One Freedom Valley Drive

Oaks, PA 19456

September 30, 2010

[October 27], 2015

Dear Shareholder:

Enclosed are a Notice of Special Meeting of Shareholders, a Proxy Statement and a proxy card for a

A special meeting of shareholders (the "Meeting") offor certain funds within the U.S. Managed Volatility Fund (the "Fund"), a series of SEI Institutional Investments Trust (the "Trust"). The Meeting isFunds complex has been scheduled for November 2, 2010. If you were[January 15], 2016.

There are two proposals scheduled to be voted at the shareholder meeting. First, shareholders are being asked to elect Trustees for the funds.  There are eight nominees, one of which is a new trustee and seven of which are existing trustees. Second, certain funds are proposing an amendment to their governing documents that would reduce the quorum requirement for shareholder meetings, which means reducing the number of shareholders that must be present in person or by proxy in order to hold a shareholder of record ofmeeting. This proposal is intended to reduce the Fund as of the close of business on September 3, 2010, you are entitled to vote at the Meeting, and any adjournment of the Meeting.

SEI Investments Management Corporation ("SIMC") currently acts as investment advisercost to the Fund. At the Meeting, the Fund's shareholders willfunds of holding a shareholder meeting, which can be asked to approve a sub-advisory agreement between SIMC and LSV Asset Management ("LSV") with respect to the Fund.significant.  If approved, by the Fund'squorum requirement would be reduced from a majority to one-third of shareholders. This second proposal will not apply to all shareholders LSVreceiving this proxy statement.  Your proxy card will manage a portion of the Fund's assets as described in the accompanying proxy materials. Youindicate whether you are being asked to vote because LSV is an affiliatefor both proposals, or only for the election of SIMC, which triggers a requirement for shareholder approval before SIMC may hire LSV as a sub-adviser to the Fund.trustees.

The Board of Trustees, of the Trust (the "Board"), including the independent trustees, has approvedrecommends the sub-advisory agreement based onelection of the researchnominees, and recommendations provided by SIMC. SIMC has comprehensively evaluated LSV's skills and investment results related to specific asset classes, investment styles and strategies. Because SIMC is responsible for paying sub-advisory fees, therecommends approval of the Fund's sub-advisory agreement with LSV will not result in any changesproposal to advisory fees or other operating expenses payablereduce quorum for shareholder meetings.

Although you may join us at the meeting, most shareholders cast their votes by the Fund.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL.

proxy. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, WE NEED YOUR VOTE. YOUR BALLOT SHOWS THE PROPOSAL ON WHICH YOU ARE BEING ASKEDFAILURE TO VOTE. PLEASE REFERVOTE WILL INCREASE COSTS TO THE FUNDS BECAUSE THE FUNDS WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY MORE FOR PROXY CARD ATTACHEDSOLICITORS TO CONTACT SHAREHOLDERS IN AN EFFORT TO OBTAIN A QUORUM FOR THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT FOR DETAILS ON HOW TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR BY LOGGING ON TO THE INTERNET. IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR ON THE INTERNET, YOU MAY ALSO MARK, SIGN, AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE.MEETING.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT TO US. PLEASE TAKE A FEW MINUTES TO REVIEW THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT AND VOTE YOUR SHARES TODAY.

Your proxy card shows the proposal(s) on which you are being asked to vote.  Please refer to the enclosed proxy card for details on how to vote by telephone or on the internet.  If you are unable to vote by telephone or on the internet, you may also mark, sign, and date the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

Thank you for your attention and consideration of thisthese important proposalproposals and for your investment in the Fund.SEI Funds. If you need additional information, please call shareholder services at 1-800-DIAL-SEI.

Sincerely,

/s/ Robert A. Nesher

Robert A. Nesher

President and Chief Executive Officer



Robert A. Nesher
President and Chief Executive Officer



(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)




IMPORTANT NEWS FOR SHAREHOLDERSINFORMATION REGARDING THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING

While we encourage you to read the full text of the enclosed Proxy Statement, herebelow is a brief overview of the matter that requires your votematters affecting you as a shareholder of the U.S. Managed Volatility Fund (the "Fund"), aone or more series of SEI Institutional Managed Trust (“SIMT”), SEI Institutional International Trust (“SIT”), SEI Institutional Investments Trust ("SIIT" or(“SIIT”), SEI Tax Exempt Trust (“STET”), SEI Daily Income Trust (“SDIT”) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust (“SAAT”) (collectively, the "Trust"“Trusts”).

Shareholders of the funds that are series of the Trusts (each, a “Fund” and, collectively, the “Funds”) are being asked to consider one or both of the following proposals.  Proposal 2 will only apply to shareholders of Funds within SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT.  Proposal 2 will not apply to shareholders of Funds within SIIT or SAAT.

Proposal 1:

To elect each of the current Trustees and one new Trustee (individually, a “Nominee” and collectively, the “Nominees”) to the Board of Trustees of the Trusts.

Proposal 2:

To amend the Agreement and Declaration of Trust for each of SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement from a majority to one-third (33-1/3%).

Q & A:  QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Q.  Why am I receiving this Proxy Statement?

A.  We are sending you this Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card on behalf of the Fund because SEI Investments Management Corporation ("SIMC"), the Fund's investment adviser, has proposed hiring LSV Asset Management ("LSV") as a sub-adviser to a portion of the assets of the Fund. The Board of Trustees (the "Board") is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Special Meeting of Shareholders and at any adjournments or postponements of the Special Meeting. As a shareholder of the Fund, you are being asked to appoint LSV as a sub-adviser of the Fund and to approve a sub-advisory agreement between SIMC and LSV with respect to the Fund (the "Proposal").

Q.  Shareholders do not typically approve the appointment of sub-advisers to the Fund, so why am I being asked to approve LSV?

A.  In general, federal securities laws require shareholders to vote on the approval of new sub-advisory agreements. Nevertheless, the Fund's shareholders do not typically approve such sub-advisory agreements due to an exemptive order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The exemptive order permits SIMC, with the approval of the Board and subject to certain conditions, to retain the services of sub-advisers for the Fund without shareholder approval. In this instance, however, SIMC may not rely on the exemptive order due to LSV's affiliation with the Fund and SIMC (SEI Investments Company ("SEI"), the parent company of SIMC, owns a minority partnership interest in LSV through its subsidiary, SEI Funds, Inc.).

Q.  Why does SIMC wish to retain LSV as a sub-adviser to the Fund?

A.  As a "manager of managers," SIMC allocates the Fund's assets to one or more sub-advisers and manages the performance and risk profiles of the Fund. SIMC has determined that the Fund will benefit from the sub-advisory services of LSV. SIMC believes that LSV's unique strategy and strong collaborative research efforts will aide the Fund in seeking to achieve its investment goal, which is capital appreciation with less volatility than the broad U.S. equity markets. LSV believes that long-term results can be achieved by systematically exploiting the judgmental biases and behavioral weaknesses that influence many investors. LSV attempts to eliminate aspects of emotional investing by using quantitative models to screen for stocks based on relative valuations and near-term fundamental and momentum improvements. Aiming for a consistent approach without subjective biases, LSV's proprietary model utilizes risk control measure s to attempt to control overall portfolio volatility while seeking to maximize expected returns.

Q.  How will the approval of the Proposal affect the Fund?

A.  Upon shareholder approval, LSV, as one of multiple sub-advisers to the Fund, will manage, in accordance with the Fund's investment strategy, the portion of the Fund's assets allocated to it by SIMC.

Q.  How will the approval of the Proposal affect the fees that are paid by shareholders?

A.  The approval of the Proposal will not result in any change to the fees that are paid by shareholders of the Fund. As with other sub-advisers to the Fund, SIMC will compensate LSV out of the investment advisory fees it receives from the Fund. However, unlike when SIMC hires other sub-advisers, SEI (SIMC's parent



company) will benefit from SIMC's hiring of LSV because it will receive a portion of the profits earned by LSV due to SEI's indirect partnership interest in LSV.

Q.  What happens if the Proposal is not approved for the Fund?

A.  If the Proposal is not approved by shareholders of the Fund, LSV's services will not be retained, and the Fund will not benefit from the performance and risk control attributes of LSV's unique investment strategy. In particular, SIMC believes that LSV's approach to reducing volatility is unique compared to other potential managers of the Fund because it relies on LSV's proprietary process for identifying economically stable companies. Alternative managers' approaches tend to rely much more on quantitative models that depend on a standard set of third party optimization or risk systems. For this reason, SIMC believes that adding LSV to the portfolio will provide better manager diversification than would be the case with alternative managers. Therefore, SIMC believes that any alternative manager that would be implemented if the Proposal is rejected will be less optimal than hiring LSV. Regardless, if the Proposal is not approved for the Fund, SIMC and the Board will then take such further action as they deem to be in the best interests of the Fund's shareholders.

Q.Why did you send me this booklet?

A.                                    You are receiving these proxy materials - a booklet that includes thea Notice of Special Meeting of Shareholders, the Proxy Statement and thea proxy card - because you have the right to vote on the Proposal in connection withthese important proposals concerning your investment in the Fund.Funds.

Q.Why am I being asked to elect Trustees?

A.                                    The reasons behind Proposal 1 arise from legal requirements that apply to mutual funds, such as the Funds.  Immediately after the addition of a new trustee, more than two-thirds of the trustees must have been elected by shareholders.  Five of the seven current Trustees were elected by shareholders.  The other two current Trustees were appointed by the Board.  Therefore, more than two-thirds of the current Trustees were elected by shareholders.

The Board recently determined that adding another Trustee would be in the best interests of the Funds and their shareholders.  However, the Board is unable to simply appoint a new Trustee to the Board because immediately after such appointment, less than two-thirds of the Trustees would have been elected by shareholders. Therefore, shareholder approval is required to add the new Trustee.

Q.How was the nomination of the new Trustee determined?

A.                                    The Board’s Governance Committee is composed entirely of Independent Trustees and is tasked with, among other things, periodically reviewing the composition of the Board (including its size and the balance of its members’ skills, experience and background), selecting and nominating candidates to serve as Independent Trustees, and evaluating the qualifications for membership of candidates.  After considering a number of candidates, the Board’s Governance Committee has unanimously voted to recommend Ms. Susan C. Cote as a Nominee for Independent Trustee based on, among other things, her educational background, business and professional experience,



and industry reputation. Based in part on the recommendation of the Governance Committee, the full Board has also unanimously voted to recommend that Fund shareholders vote to elect the Nominees.

Q.Why do current Trustees have to be elected?

A.                                    Alongside the election of Ms. Cote as a new Trustee, shareholders are being asked to elect the full slate of current Trustees to the Board of the Trusts.  Given that the Trusts will already be incurring the costs of a proxy statement to elect Ms. Cote, the Board recommends that shareholders also elect (or re-elect, as the case may be) all of the current Trustees to the Board to reduce future Fund expenses by effectively extended the period of time until another shareholder proxy to elect trustees will be required.  In other words, by electing the current Trustees at this time, the Funds will have more flexibility to fill a future vacancy on the Board without having to incur the cost and time of a shareholder proxy.

Q.What will happen if the current Trustees are not elected?

A.                                    The current Trustees will remain in place on the Board, even if the Trusts do not receive sufficient votes to formally elect them.  However, failing to elect the Trustees would result in the Funds incurring significant costs in connection with a shareholder proxy the next time that a Trustee is replaced or the Board determines to add an additional Trustee.  If the proposal is not approved, the Board will take such further action as it deems to be in the best interests of the Funds’ shareholders, which may include reproposing the election of any Trustees who are not elected.

Q.Why is the Board recommending that SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT reduce their shareholder quorum requirement?

A.                                    After careful consideration and based on costs incurred by the Funds in connection with prior shareholder meetings, the Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the Funds that are series of SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT to reduce their shareholder quorum requirements. Quorum means the number of shareholders that must be present at a shareholder meeting (in person or by proxy) in order for a vote to be taken. Presently, a majority of the shares entitled to vote constitutes a quorum.  This places considerable cost burdens on the Funds due to the expenses related to proxy voting.  Therefore, the Board recommends that shareholders vote to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement to one-third of shareholders in order to reduce Fund expenses incurred through proxy solicitation efforts.

For each of SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT, the quorum requirement is set forth in a governing document called a Declaration of Trust.  The quorum requirement in the Declarations of Trust may only be amended with approval of shareholders.  Therefore, at the shareholder meeting, shareholders are being asked to approve amendments to the Declarations of Trust for SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT that will lower the quorum requirement.

Q.Why don’t the Funds of SIIT and SAAT have to vote to amend their shareholder quorum requirement?

A.                                    The shareholder quorum requirements for SIIT and SAAT are contained in each Trust’s By-Laws, which may be changed by the Board without the vote of shareholders.  At a meeting of the Board held on September 15 and 16, 2015, the Board unanimously approved a resolution to

2



amend the By-Laws of SIIT and SAAT to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement to one-third (33-1/3%).

Q.What will happen if the Proposal to reduce the shareholder voting requirement is not approved by shareholders?

A.                                    If the shareholders of any Trust do not vote to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement, then the shareholder quorum requirement for that Trust will remain a majority.  Effectively this will require additional effort from the Trusts whenever a shareholder vote is required, which will result in greater expenses to the Fund.  If the proposal is not approved, the Board will take such further action as it deems to be in the best interests of the Funds’ shareholders, which may include reproposing the proposal at a later time.

Q.How does the Board recommend that I vote?

A.  The Board,                                    After careful consideration, the Trustees, including allthe Independent Trustees who compose a majority of the Trustees who are not "interested persons" (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the Trust, has approved the appointment of LSV as a sub-adviser of the Fund and has approved the sub-advisory agreement between SIMC and LSV. The Board, unanimously recommendsrecommend that shareholders ofyou vote “FOR” the Fund vote in favor of the Proposal.Proposals, as applicable to your Fund.

Q.How Do I Place My Vote and Whom Do I Call for More Information?

Q.A.  How do I place my vote and whom do I call for more information?

A.                                    You may vote your shares by any of the following methods:

(1) Telephone:Call the telephone number provided on the proxy card attached to the enclosed Proxy Statement;

(2) Internet:Log on to the Internet as directed on the proxy card attached to the enclosed Proxy Statement and vote electronically by following the on-line instructions;electronically;

(3) Regular Mail:If you are unable to vote by telephone or on the Internet, you can fill out the proxy card attached to the enclosed Proxy Statement and return it to us as directed on the proxy card; or

(4) Shareholder Meeting:You may attend the shareholder meeting on November 2, 2010[January 15, 2016], and vote in person.

We would prefer that you vote by telephone or on the Internet, if possible, because that enables a quicker processing of proxy votes and reduces costs.costs to the Funds. Please refer to the proxy card attached to the enclosedthis Proxy Statement for further instructions on how to vote.  Should you require additional information regarding the Proposalproxy or replacement of proxy cards, please call 1-800-DIAL-SEI.

Your Vote Is Important.  Thank You for Promptly VotingRecording Your Shares.Vote.

3




SEI INSTITUTIONAL MANAGED TRUST

SEI INSTITUTIONAL INTERNATIONAL TRUST

SEI INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS TRUST

U.S. Managed Volatility FundSEI TAX EXEMPT TRUST

SEI DAILY INCOME TRUST

SEI ASSET ALLOCATION TRUST

One Freedom Valley Drive

Oaks, PA 19456

NOTICE OF

SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON
NOVEMBER 2, 2010 [JANUARY 15], 2016

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of shareholders (the "Meeting"“Meeting”) of the U.S. Managed Volatility Fund (the "Fund"),funds that are a series of SEI Institutional Managed Trust (“SIMT”), SEI Institutional International Trust (“SIT”), SEI Institutional Investments Trust ("SIIT" or(“SIIT”), SEI Tax Exempt Trust (“STET”), SEI Daily Income Trust (“SDIT”) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust (“SAAT”) (each individually, a “Trust” and collectively, the "Trust"“Trusts”), will be held at the offices of SEI Investments Management Corporation ("SIMC"), the investment adviser to the Fund,Trusts, One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456 at 3:[3:00 p.m.], Eastern Time, on November 2, 2010[January 15], 2016, for the following purpose:

1.

a.                                      To appoint LSV Asset Management ("LSV"consider the following proposals (“Proposals”) as(Proposal 2 applies only to shareholders of funds that are a sub-adviserseries of the FundSTET, SDIT, SIMT and to approve a sub-advisory agreement between SIMC and LSV with respect to the Fund (the "Proposal").SIT):

2.

Proposal 1:

To elect each of the current Trustees and one new Trustee (individually, a “Nominee” and collectively, the “Nominees”) to the Board of Trustees of the Trusts.

Proposal 2:

To amend the Agreement and Declaration of Trust for each of SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement from a majority to one-third (33-1/3%).

b.                                      To transact such other business as may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

The Proposal isProposals are discussed in the attached Proxy Statement.  The Board of Trustees of the TrustTrusts recommends that you vote FOR the Proposal.Proposals.

Shareholders of record at the close of business on September 3, 2010[October 16], 2015 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting or any adjournments thereof.  You are invited to attend the Meeting, but if you do not wish tocannot do so, please vote by telephone, or by logging on to the Internet to vote electronically.  Please refer to the proxy card attached to the attachedenclosed Proxy Statement for details.  If you are unable to vote by telephone, or on the Internet, you may also complete and sign the enclosed proxy card and return it in the accompanying envelope.envelope as promptly as possible.  Your vote is important no matter how many shares you own. You can vote easily and quickly by telephone, Internet, mail or in person at the Meeting. Please vote as promptly as possible.

By Order of the Board of Trustees

/s/Timothy D. Barto

Vice President and Secretary



Voting is important to ensure a quorum at the Meeting.  Please call 1-800-DIAL-SEI for more information or if you have any questions about attending the Meeting in person.  Proxies may be revoked at any time before they are exercised by submitting to the Secretary of the Trust at the address above a written notice of revocation, by a subsequently executed proxy card or by attending the Meeting and voting in person.  Attendance at the Meeting will not by itself serve to revoke a proxy.

2



SEI INSTITUTIONAL MANAGED TRUST

SEI INSTITUTIONAL INTERNATIONAL TRUST

SEI INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS TRUST

SEI TAX EXEMPT TRUST

SEI DAILY INCOME TRUST

SEI ASSET ALLOCATION TRUST

One Freedom Valley Drive

Oaks, PA 19456

PROXY STATEMENT

SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON [JANUARY 15], 2016

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Trustees of SEI Institutional Managed Trust (“SIMT”), SEI Institutional International Trust (“SIT”), SEI Institutional Investments Trust (“SIIT”), SEI Tax Exempt Trust (“STET”), SEI Daily Income Trust (“SDIT”) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust (“SAAT”) (each, a “Trust” and collectively, the “Trusts”), on behalf of all the funds that are series of any Trust (the “Funds”), to be voted at a special meeting of shareholders of the Funds to be held at the offices of the Trusts, One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456, on [January 15, 2016] at [3:00 p.m.], Eastern Time, and at any and all adjournments thereof (the “Meeting”).  Shareholders of record of the Funds at the close of business on [October 16], 2015 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting.  This Proxy Statement and the accompanying notice of special meeting and proxy card are first being mailed to shareholders on or about [October 27], 2015.

The Meeting is being held to consider and vote on the following proposals as well as any other business that may properly come before the Meeting (Proposal 2 applies only to shareholders of funds that are a series of SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT):

Proposal 1:

To elect each of the Trust atcurrent Trustees and one new Trustee (individually, a “Nominee” and collectively, the address above a written notice of revocation, submitting a subsequently executed proxy card or by attending the Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Meeting will not by itself serve to revoke a proxy.



(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)




SEI INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS TRUST

U.S. Managed Volatility Fund

One Freedom Valley Drive
Oaks, PA 19456

PROXY STATEMENT

SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 2, 2010

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Trustees of SEI Institutional Investments Trust ("SIIT" or the "Trust"“Nominees”), on behalf of the U.S. Managed Volatility Fund (the "Fund"), to be voted at a special meeting of shareholders of the Fund at the offices of SEI Investments Management Corporation ("SIMC" or the "Adviser"), the investment adviser to the Fund, One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456, on November 2, 2010 at 3:00 p.m., Eastern Time, and at any and all adjournments thereof (the "Meeting"). Shareholders of record of the Fund at the close of business on September 3, 2010 (the "Record Date") are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting. This Proxy Statement and the accompanying notice of special meeting and proxy card are first being mailed to shareholders on or about September 30, 2010.

The Meeting is being held to consider and vote on the following proposal as well as any other business that may properly come before the Meeting:

Proposal:  To appoint LSV Asset Management ("LSV") as a sub-adviser of the Fund and to approve a sub-advisory agreement between SIMC and LSV with respect to the Fund (the "Proposal").

As used in this Proxy Statement, the term "Board" refers to the Board of Trustees of the Trust. The term "Trustee" includesTrusts.

Proposal 2:

To amend the Agreement and Declaration of Trust for each trusteeof SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement from a majority to one-third (33-1/3%).

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

This Proxy Statement is available at www.proxyvote.com.

A-1



THE PROPOSALS

Shareholders of the Funds are being asked:

Proposal 1:

To elect each of the Board. A Trustee who is not an "interested person," as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"), of the Trust is referred to in this Proxy Statement as an "Independent Trustee."

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

This Proxy Statement is available at www.proxyvote.com.



(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)




THE PROPOSAL

TO APPOINT LSV AS A SUB-ADVISER TO THE FUND AND TO APPROVE A SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENT BETWEEN SIMC AND LSV WITH RESPECT TO THE FUND

Description of the Proposal

Shareholders of the Fund are being asked to appoint LSV as a sub-adviser of the Fund and approve a sub-advisory agreement between SIMC and LSV with respect to the Fund (the "Sub-Advisory Agreement"). Pursuant to the Sub-Advisory Agreement, LSV will manage the portion of the Fund's assets allocated to it by SIMC in accordance with the Fund's investment strategies as described in its registration statement.

In general, the Investment Company Act requires all new investment advisory agreements, including sub-advisory agreements, to be approved by the vote of a "majority of the outstanding voting securities" (as defined in the Investment Company Act) of a registered investment company. However, SIMC and the Trust have obtained an exemptive order from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") that permits SIMC, with the approval of the Board and subject to certain conditions, to retain unaffiliated investment sub-advisers for the Fund without submitting the sub-advisory agreement to a vote of the Fund's shareholders (the "Order"). The Trust and SIMC, however, may not rely on the Order with respect to the retention of LSV, because LSV is an affiliated investment sub-adviser (SEI Fun ds, Inc., an affiliate of SIMC, owns a minority interest in LSV). Accordingly, the purpose of this Proxy Statement is to submit the Sub-Advisory Agreement to a vote of the Fund's shareholders pursuant to the requirements of the Investment Company Act described above.

SIMC currently serves as the investment adviser to the Fund pursuant to an investment advisory agreement between the Trust and SIMC, dated June 14, 1996, as amended (the "Advisory Agreement"). The Board approved the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for an additional one year period at its Board meeting held on March 23-25, 2010 (the "Board Meeting"). As described in more detail below, at the Board Meeting, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, also unanimously approved (a) the appointment of LSV as a sub-adviser to the Fund and (b) the Fund's Sub-Advisory Agreement. In addition, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, unanimously recommended the approval of the Fund's Sub-Advisory Agreement to the Fund's shareholders.

The Fund operates in what is commonly referred to as a "manager of managers" structure pursuant to the terms of the Order. SIMC acts as the "manager of managers" of the Fund, and is responsible for the investment performance of the Fund by allocating the Fund's assets to one or more sub-advisers and recommends the hiring or termination of sub-advisers to the Board. Each sub-adviser makes investment decisions for the assets it manages and continuously reviews and administers its portion of the Fund's investment program. SIMC oversees the sub-advisers to ensure compliance with the Fund's investment policies and guidelines, and monitors each sub-adviser's adherence to its investment style. SIMC receives, for its services, a management fee from the Fund and pays the sub-advisers out of that fee. SIMC currently employs two sub-advisers for the Fund.

In its role as manager of managers, SIMC has determined that the Fund will benefit from the sub-advisory services of LSV. SIMC believes that LSV's unique strategy and strong collaborative research efforts will aide the Fund in seeking to achieve its investment goal, which is capital appreciation with less volatility than the broad U.S. equity markets. LSV believes that superior long-term results can be achieved by systematically exploiting the judgmental biases and behavioral weaknesses that influence many investors. LSV attempts to eliminate aspects of emotional investing by using quantitative models to screen for stocks based on relative valuations and near-term fundamental and momentum improvements. Aiming for a consistent approach without subjective biases, LSV's proprietary model utilizes risk control measures to attempt to control overall portfolio volatility


while seeking to maximize expected returns. SIMC believes that LSV's approach to reducing volatility is unique compared to other potential managers of the Fund because it relies on LSV's proprietary process for identifying economically stable companies. Alternative managers' approaches tend to rely much more on quantitative models that depend on a standard set of third party optimization or risk systems. For this reason, SIMC believes that adding LSV as a sub-adviser to the Fund will provide better manager diversification than would be the case with alternative managers.

SIMC selected LSV after undertaking extensive research of potential advisers, which involved both qualitative and quantitative analysis. SIMC recommends that shareholders vote in favor of the Proposal to appoint LSV as a sub-adviser of the Fund and to approve the Sub-Advisory Agreement between SIMC and LSV.

If approved by shareholders, LSV will manage the portion of the Fund's assets allocated to it by SIMC in a manner consistent with the Fund's investment objective, policies and limitations under the supervision of SIMC and the Board. Because SIMC pays the Fund's sub-advisers out of the investment advisory fees that SIMC receives from the Fund, the hiring of LSV will not result in any changes to the Fund's expenses.

Description of the Material Terms of the Sub-Advisory Agreement

As described in more detail below, at the Board Meeting the Board considered the approval of the Fund's Sub-Advisory Agreement pursuant to which LSV will act as a sub-adviser for the Fund. The Sub-Advisory Agreement is attached hereto as Appendix A. The Sub-Advisory Agreement is substantially the same as the existing sub-advisory agreement between SIMC and LSV with respect to other series of the Trust. The description of the material terms of the Sub-Advisory Agreement below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Sub-Advisory Agreement set forth in Appendix A.

Investment Advisory Services. LSV is responsible for providing the following investment advisory services to the Fund under the Sub-Advisory Agreement: (i) deciding what securities and other assets of the Fund will be purchased, retained or sold by the portion of the Fund's assets entrusted to it; (ii) arranging for the purchase and the sale of securities and other assets held by the Fund by placing purchase and sale orders with brokers or dealers selected by LSV; (iii) in its selection of brokers or dealers and the placing of orders, seeking the best overall terms available under the circumstances; and (iv) providing SIMC or the Board with periodic and special reports, balance sheets or financial information, and such other information with regard to its affairs as SIMC or the Board may reasonably request in administering the affairs of the F und. All services provided by LSV under the Sub-Advisory Agreement are required to be performed in accordance with the Fund's registration statement, compliance policies and procedures, and governing documents, the instructions and directions of SIMC and of the Board, and the requirements of the Investment Company Act and other applicable laws.

Compensation. For the services to be provided by LSV to the Fund, SIMC will pay LSV a sub-advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.25%, calculated based on the average daily value of the Fund's assets entrusted to LSV, and will be paid to LSV monthly. No fee will be accrued under the Sub-Advisory Agreement with respect to any day that the value of the Fund's assets under LSV's management equals zero. Because SEI Investments Company ("SEI," SIMC's parent company) maintains a minority partnership interest in LSV through its subsidiary, SEI Funds, Inc., of approximately 42%, SEI will benefit from the profits earned by LSV on the sub-advisory services it provides to the Fund.

Indemnification. Under the Sub-Advisory Agreement, LSV has an obligation to indemnify and hold harmless SIMC from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities or damages (including reasonable attorney's fees and other related expenses) arising from or in connection with the performance of LSV's obligations under the Sub-Advisory Agreement. However, LSV's foregoing indemnification obligation will be reduced to the extent that the claim against, or the loss, liability or damage experienced by SIMC is caused by


SIMC's own willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence, or to the reckless disregard of its duties under the Sub-Advisory Agreement. SIMC has the same reciprocal indemnification obligation to LSV under the Sub-Advisory Agreement.

Soft Dollars. The terms of the Sub-Advisory Agreement authorize LSV to pay to a broker or dealer who provides brokerage and research services a commission for executing a portfolio transaction for the Fund which is in excess of the amount of commission another broker or dealer would have charged for effecting that transaction, but only if, LSV determines in good faith that such commission was reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided by such broker or dealer (commonly referred to as "soft dollar arrangements"). Although soft dollar arrangements are allowed under the Sub-Advisory Agreement, LSV does not currently use soft dollar arrangements with any transactions of the various other SEI sponsored mutual funds that it provides advisory services to and does not currently plan to use soft dollar arrangeme nts for any Fund transactions.

Maintenance of Books and Records. Under the Sub-Advisory Agreement, LSV is required to maintain separate books and detailed records of all matters pertaining to the securities and other assets held by the Fund as required by Rule 31a-1 under the Investment Company Act (other than those records being maintained by the Fund's other service providers) relating to its responsibilities under the Sub-Advisory Agreement, and shall preserve such records for the periods and in the manner prescribed by Rule 31a-2 under the Investment Company Act.

Reporting Obligation. LSV has an obligation to provide the Trust's Chief Compliance Officer with reports relating to LSV's compliance program, including any "material compliance matters" (as such term is defined in Rule 38a-1 under the Investment Company Act) occurring at LSV. LSV is also required to provide the Trust's Chief Compliance Officer with reasonable access to the testing, analyses, reports and other documentation LSV uses in connection with monitoring of the effectiveness of the implementation of its compliance program.

Duration and Termination. If approved by shareholders at the Meeting, the Sub-Advisory Agreement is scheduled to continue in effect for an initial two year term, and may be continued from year to year thereafter if approved by a majority vote of the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval or as otherwise required by the Investment Company Act. The Sub-Advisory Agreement can be terminated (a) by the Fund at any time, without the payment of any penalty, by the vote of a majority of Trustees of the Trust or by the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund, (b) by SIMC at any time, without the payment of any penalty, on not more than 60 days' nor less than 30 days' written notice to LSV, or (c) by LSV at any time, without the pa yment of any penalty, on 90 days' written notice to SIMC.

Governing Law. The Sub-Advisory Agreement is governed by the internal laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, without regard to conflict of law principles; provided, however, that nothing therein shall be construed as being inconsistent with the Investment Company Act.

Information about LSV

LSV, a general partnership organized under the laws of Delaware and located at 155 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 4600, Chicago, Illinois 60606, is a registered investment adviser that provides investment advisory services to institutions, including pension plans and investment companies. LSV is a value-oriented contrarian money manager offering a deep-value investment process utilizing a proprietary equity investment model to identify securities generally considered to be out of favor by the market. LSV is an adviser or sub-adviser to a number of equity mutual funds, including other SEI sponsored mutual funds. As of June 30, 2010, LSV managed


approximately $51.3 billion in total assets, of which approximately $1.3 billion were assets in SEI sponsored mutual funds.

The following are the names of persons who control LSV and the basis of their control as of June 1, 2010. Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person is 155 North Wacker Drive, Suite 4600, Chicago, IL 60606.

NameBasis of Control
Tremaine A. AtkinsonExecutive Officer
Josef LakonishokExecutive Officer
SEI Funds, Inc.*
One Freedom Valley Drive
Oaks, PA 19456

Ownership of more than 25%, but less than 50%, of LSV's voting
securities

*  SEI Funds, Inc. is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of SEI.

Listed below are the names, titles and addresses of each principal executive officer and general partner of LSV. Except as noted below, the principal business address of each principal executive officer and general partner of LSV is 155 North Wacker Drive, Suite 4600, Chicago, IL 60606.

NameTitle
Josef LakonishokChief Executive Officer, Chief Investment Officer**
Tremaine AtkinsonChief Operating Officer, Chief Compliance Officer**
Lakonishok CorporationGeneral Partner
Vishny CorporationGeneral Partner
Lacroix LLCGeneral Partner
Menno, L.L.C.General Partner
11-11L.L.C.General Partner
LSV Employee Group, LLCGeneral Partner
SEI Funds, Inc.
One Freedom Valley
Drive Oaks, PA 19456


General Partner

** Title reflects principal occupation.

LSV currently serves as investment sub-adviser to the following mutual funds, which have investment objectives and strategies similar to the Fund. These funds, their approximate net assets and the annual sub-advisory fees payable by these funds to LSV are as follows:

Fund Name Sub-Advisory Fee Rate Net Assets (as of June 30, 2010) 
SEI Institutional Managed Trust
U.S. Managed Volatility Fund
  0.25% $349,537,778  
SEI Institutional Managed Trust
Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
  0.25% $199,007,790  


Currently, LSV is a sub-adviser to a portion of the assets of the Trust's Large Cap, Small Cap and Small/Mid Cap Equity Funds. For the most recently completed fiscal year of each fund listed below, SIMC paid LSV sub-advisory fees with respect to these funds as follows:

Fund Name Sub-Advisory Fees Paid (000) 
SIIT Large Cap Fund $198  
SIIT Small Cap Fund $411  
SIIT Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund $807  

No officer or Trustee of the Trust is an officer, employee or partner of LSV or owns interests in, or has a material direct interest in, LSV. Robert A. Nesher and William M. Doran, each an "interested person" (as defined in the Investment Company Act) of the Trust, may have an indirect interest in LSV by virtue of their ownership of securities of SEI and their relationship with the Trust's distributor and SIMC, each of which is a subsidiary of SEI. SEI will benefit from SIMC's hiring of LSV because it will receive a portion of the profits earned by LSV due to its indirect partnership interest in LSV.

Matters Considered by the Board

At the Board Meeting, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, unanimously approved the Fund's Sub-Advisory Agreement and recommended the approval of the Sub-Advisory Agreement to the Fund's shareholders. When considering the approval of the Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Trustees reviewed materials furnished by SIMC and LSV and considered the Board's fiduciary obligations and the standards to be used by the Board in reaching its decision. In considering whether to approve the Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Board considered and discussed a substantial amount of information and analysis provided by SIMC and LSV. SIMC explained the specific reasons for its recommendation to hire LSV, which are described above. SIMC also explained that the Proposal would need to be approved by the Fund's shareholders, which would involve a proxy solicitation and a special shareholders' meeting, and informed the Board that SIMC would bear the expenses associated with such solicitation and meeting.

In preparation for the Board Meeting, the Board requested and received written materials from LSV and SIMC that addressed, among other things, the following topics (a) the nature and quality of LSV's proposed investment management and other services; (b) LSV's investment management personnel; (c) LSV's operations and financial condition; (d) LSV's brokerage practices (including any soft dollar arrangements) and investment strategies; (e) the level of investment management services provided by LSV to other SEI sponsored mutual funds; (f) LSV's compliance systems, including LSV's policies and compliance procedures for personal securities transactions; (g) the current investment strategies employed by the Fund; (h) LSV's reputation, expertise and resources in financial markets; (i) the Fund's performance compared with similar mutual funds; and (j) the expected impact on SIMC's profitability of the appointment of LSV as a sub-advise r to the Fund.

In addition, at the Board Meeting, SIMC presented additional oral and written information to the Board to help the Board evaluate the quality of LSV's proposed investment advisory services. At the Board Meeting, the Board had the opportunity to ask questions and request further information regarding the appointment of LSV as a sub-adviser to the Fund.

In connection with the approval of the Fund's Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Board considered the following factors:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services. The Board considered the nature, extent and quality of the services to be provided by LSV to the Fund and the resources it would dedicate to the Fund. In this regard, the Trustees evaluated, among other things, LSV's portfolio management personnel, experience and compliance


program. The Trustees considered LSV's specialization in value equity management for institutional investors, LSV's strong research staff, led by Josef Lakonishok, who would be one of the portfolio managers for the Fund, LSV's U.S. controlled volatility strategy, which would be employed by LSV in managing the Fund, and LSV's portfolio management risk control process, which is designed to control overall portfolio volatility consistent with the Fund's principal investment strategy. Because LSV serves as an investment sub-adviser to other SEI sponsored mutual funds for which the Board also oversees, the Board considered its own familiarity with the nature and quality of LSV's services. Following its evaluation, the Board concluded that, within the context of its full deliberations, the nature, extent and quality of services to be provided by LSV to the Fund and the resources of LSV to be dedicated to the Fund supported approval of the Sub-Advisory Agreement.

Investment Performance. The Board considered the written information provided by LSV regarding the historical investment performance of LSV's similarly managed account. Because LSV serves as an investment sub-adviser to other SEI sponsored mutual funds which the Board also oversees, the Board also considered its own familiarity with LSV's historical investment performance for these other mutual funds. Following evaluation, the Board concluded that, within the context of its full deliberations, that the historical investment performance of LSV and its investment management personnel, considering both recent and long-term performance, supported approval of the Sub-Advisory Agreement.

Cost of Services. The Board reviewed the proposed sub-advisory fee to be paid by SIMC to LSV with respect to the Fund. The Board reviewed the information provided by LSV with respect to the investment advisory fee charged to their other clients for similar services. The Board also reviewed the information provided by SIMC with respect to the sub-advisory fees paid to other sub-advisers to the Fund for similar services. The Board took into account the fact that LSV will be compensated by SIMC, and not by the Fund, and that SIMC's advisory fee with respect to the Fund will not increase in connection with the appointment of LSV as a sub-adviser to the Fund. The Board also took into consideration that even though SIMC's advisory fee will not increase due to the appointment of LSV, SIMC's parent company will receive a portion of LSV's profits as a result of its partnership interest in LSV. Following evaluation, the Board concluded that, within the context of its full deliberations, the proposed sub-advisory fee to be paid by SIMC to LSV with respect to the Fund is reasonable in light of the extent and quality of the services expected to be provided to the Fund by LSV and supported approval of the Sub-Advisory Agreement.

Profits to be Realized by LSV and Economies of Scale. The Board did not make any conclusions regarding LSV's profitability with respect to the Fund or economies of scale associated with the retention of LSV because (a) LSV will be compensated by SIMC, and not by the Fund, and (b) the Board annually considers the existence of any economies of scale with respect to the Fund and whether those economies are passed along to the Fund's shareholders through SIMC's investment advisory fee schedule or other means, including any fee waivers by SIMC.

Conclusions. Based on the Trustees' deliberations and their evaluation of the information described above and other factors and information they believed relevant, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, unanimously approved (a) the appointment of LSV as a sub-adviser to the Fund and, (b) the Fund's Sub-Advisory Agreement. The Board concluded, in the exercise of its reasonable judgment, that the terms of the Sub-Advisory Agreement, including the compensation to be paid thereunder, are fair and reasonable in relation to the services expected to be provided by LSV to the Fund and that the appointment of LSV and the approval of the Sub-Advisory Agreement would be in the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders. The Board also determined that LSV serving as a sub-adviser to the Fund does not involve any conflict of interest fro m which LSV or SIMC or any of SIMC's affiliates would derive an inappropriate advantage. In addition, based on the foregoing conclusions, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, unanimously concluded to recommend the approval of the Sub-Advisory Agreement to the Fund's shareholders.


In reaching its determination regarding the approval of the Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Board, including all of the Independent Trustees, considered all factors and information they believed relevant, including the factors and information discussed above. In their deliberations, the Board members did not identify any particular factor or information that was all important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different weights to the various factors and information.

THE BOARD, INCLUDING ALL OF THE INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES,
UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS
VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSAL.

INFORMATION ABOUT SIMC

SIMC serves as the investment adviser to the Fund. SIMC is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser and is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of SEI, the principal executive office of which is located at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456. SEI is a public company and is listed on the NASDAQ exchange. As of June 30, 2010, SIMC had more than $83.2 billion in assets under management in over 10,000 accounts, both discretionary and non-discretionary.

The following table shows: (i) the dollar amount of fees paid to SIMC by the Fund; and (ii) the dollar amount of SIMC's voluntary fee waivers for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010:

Fund Name Advisory Fees Paid (000) Advisory Fees Waived (000) 
U.S. Managed Volatility Fund $1,781  $865  

The following table shows the dollar amount of fees paid to the Fund's sub-advisers by SIMC for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010:

Fund Name Sub-Advisory Fees Paid (000) 
U.S. Managed Volatility Fund $666  

INFORMATION ABOUT OTHER SERVICE PROVIDERS

Principal Underwriter

SEI Investments Distribution Company ("SIDCo") serves as the principal underwriter of the Fund. The principal executive office of SIDCo is located at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456.

Administrator and Transfer Agent

SEI Investments Global Funds Services (the "Administrator") serves as the administrator and transfer agent for the Fund. The Administrator's address is One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456. The Fund paid $137,000 in fees to the Administrator for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010. The Administrator will continue to provide administrative and transfer agent services if the Sub-Advisory Agreement is approved by shareholders.

BROKERAGE COMMISSIONS

For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010, the Fund paid no brokerage fees to affiliated brokers.


VOTING INFORMATION

Required Vote

Approval of the Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a "majority of the outstanding voting securities" (as defined by the Investment Company Act) of the Fund, which means, with respect to the Fund, the lesser of (a) 67% or more of the shares of the Fund present at the Meeting if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Fund are present in person or by proxy or (b) more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Fund.

If the Proposal is not approved by shareholders of the Fund, LSV's services will not be retained, and the Fund will not benefit from the performance and risk control attributes of LSV's unique investment strategy. In particular, SIMC believes that LSV's approach to reducing volatility is unique compared to other potential managers of the Fund because it relies on LSV's proprietary process for identifying economically stable companies. Alternative managers' approaches tend to rely much more on quantitative models that depend on a standard set of third party optimization or risk systems. For this reason, SIMC believes that adding LSV to each portfolio will provide better manager diversification than would be the case with alternative managers. Therefore, SIMC believes that any alternative manager that would be implemented if the Proposal is rejected will be less optimal than hiring LSV. Regardless, if the Proposal is not approved for the Fund, SIMC and the Board will then take such further action as they deem to be in the best interests of the Fund's shareholders.

Quorum

In order to act upon the Proposal, a quorum is required to be present at the Meeting. The presence of a majority of the shares of the Fund entitled to vote in person or by proxy shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Meeting for the Fund.

Abstentions and "broker non-votes" (i.e., proxies received from brokers indicating that they have not received instructions from the beneficial owner or other person entitled to vote shares) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Meeting. However, abstentions and "broker non-votes" will have the same effect as a vote "against" the Proposal. Pursuant to certain rules promulgated by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. that govern the voting by broker-dealers, a broker-dealer holding shares of record for a beneficial owner may not exercise discretionary voting power with respect to certain non-routine matters (including the approval of investment sub-advisory agreements). It is anticipated that such broker-dealers will not have discretionary auth ority to vote on the Proposal. The absence of instructions from the beneficial owner will result in a "broker non-vote" with respect to the Proposal.

Adjournment

If a quorum is not present at the Meeting, or if a quorum is present but sufficient votes in favor of the Proposal are not received by the time scheduled for the Meeting, the persons named as proxies may propose one or more adjournments of the Meeting for a period or periods to permit further solicitation of proxies. If a quorum is present at the Meeting, any such adjournment will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the question, in person or by proxy, at the session of the Meeting to be adjourned. The persons named as proxies will vote in favor of adjournments those proxies that they are entitled to vote in favor of the Proposal. They will vote against any such adjournment those proxies required to be voted against the Proposal. SIMC will bear the costs of any additional solicitation and any adjourned sessions.

Voting

Shares represented by duly executed proxies will be voted at the Meeting in accordance with the instructions given. However, if no instructions are specified on the proxy with respect to the Proposal, shares will be


voted FOR the approval of the Proposal and in accordance with the judgment of the persons appointed as proxies upon any other matter that may properly come before the Meeting. If you wish to participate in the Meeting, you may submit the proxy card included with this Proxy Statement or attend in person. Your vote is important no matter how many shares you own. You can vote easily and quickly by telephone, Internet, mail or in person. Should you require additional information regarding the proxy or replacement proxy cards, you may contact SIIT at 1-800-DIAL-SEI.

Revocation

A shareholder may revoke a previously submitted proxy at any time prior to the Meeting by (i) a written revocation, which must be signed and include the shareholder's name and account number, received by the Secretary of the Trust at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456; (ii) properly executing a later-dated proxy card; or (iii) attending the Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Meeting will not by itself serve to revoke a proxy.

Solicitation of Proxies, Payment of Expenses

The solicitation of proxies is being made on behalf of the Board, who are acting on behalf of the Fund. The Fund has retained Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (the "Proxy Solicitor") to aid in the solicitation. The costs of retaining the Proxy Solicitor and other expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation of proxies will be paid by SIMC. The anticipated cost associated with the solicitation of proxies by the Proxy Solicitor is approximately $52,000 plus any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the Proxy Solicitor. Proxies may be solicited by mail, electronically, by telephone, fax, in person or by other means, and representatives of the Proxy Solicitor, SIIT, SIMC and SEI may participate in the solicitation of proxies.

SIMC will pay all expenses related to conducting this proxy, including, but not limited to, preparation, printing and mailing of this Proxy Statement and its enclosures, legal fees, and solicitation costs. SIMC estimates these costs to be approximately $80,000.

OTHER INFORMATION

Shareholders Sharing the Same Address

If two or more shareholders share the same address, only one copy of this Proxy Statement is being delivered to that address, unless SIIT has received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders at that shared address. Upon written or oral request, SIIT will deliver promptly a separate copy of this Proxy Statement to a shareholder at a shared address. Please note that each shareholder will receive a separate proxy card, regardless of whether he or she resides at a shared address. Please call 1-800-DIAL-SEI or forward a written request to SIIT, One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456 if you would like to (1) receive a separate copy of this Proxy Statement; (2) receive your annual reports, semi-annual reports or proxy statements separately in the future; or (3) request delivery of a single copy of annual reports, semi-annual reports or proxy statements if you are currently receiving multiple copies at a s hared address.

Shareholder Proposals

SIIT is organized as a business trust under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. As such, SIIT is not required to, and does not have, annual meetings, except to the extent that such meetings are required under the Investment Company Act or state law. Shareholders who wish to submit proposals for inclusion in the proxy statement for a future shareholder meeting should send their written proposals to the Secretary of SIIT at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456 within a reasonable time before such meeting. Submission of a


proposal does not necessarily mean that such proposal will be included in SIIT's proxy statement since inclusion in the proxy statement is subject to compliance with certain federal regulations.

Communications to the Board

Shareholders wishing to submit written communications to the Board should send their communications to the Secretary of the Trust at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456. Any such communications received will be reviewed by the Board at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

Shares Outstanding

As of the Record Date, the net assets and the approximate number of shares issued and outstanding (rounded to the nearest whole share) for the Fund were as follows:

Name of Fund Net Assets Shares Outstanding 
U.S. Managed Volatility Fund $126,584,036   11,022,938  

Beneficial Ownership of Shares and Security Ownership of Management

As of the Record Date, the following persons were the only persons who were record owners or, to the knowledge of the Fund, were beneficial owners of 5% or more of the Fund's outstanding shares. With respect to the shares referred to in the tables below as being held of record, the Fund believes that most of these shares were held by the below persons in accounts for their fiduciary, agency or custodial customers.

Name and Address of Shareholder Amount of Shares Percent of
Share Class
 Nature of Ownership 
Northern Trust Company
Trustee
FBO Hospira
PO Box 92956
Chicago, IL 60675-0001
  4,240,312.446   38.47% Record 
Wells Fargo Bank NA FBO Mitsubishi Motors
NA — SIMC 80008518
PO Box 1533
Minneapolis, MN
55480-1533
  2,332,373.792   21.16% Record 
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Mitsubishi Motors
NA-STIF-20057800
PO Box 1533
Minneapolis, MN
55480-1533
  1,805,399.989   9.85% Record 
Penfirn Co
FBO 1030612866
PO Box 3327
Omaha, NE 68103-0327
  590,020.808   5.35% Record 


As of the Record Date, SIMC and its affiliates were believed to possess voting power with respect to approximately 2,076,521.39 (18.84%) of the outstanding shares (rounded to the nearest whole share) of the Fund. SIMC and its affiliates will vote any shares of the Fund over which they have voting power in the same proportion as the vote of all other shareholders of the Fund. This proportional voting may result in a small number of shareholders of the Fund determining the vote on the Proposal.

As of the Record Date, the Trustees and executive officers of the Trust, asone new Trustee (individually, a group, owned less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding shares of the Fund.

Other Business

The Board does not intend to present any other business at the Meeting. If any other matter may properly come before the Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, the persons named in the accompanying proxy card intend to vote, act, or consent thereunder in accordance with their best judgment at that time with respect to such matters unless such proxy contains specific restrictions to the contrary.

Reports to Shareholders

For a free copy of the Fund's most recent annual report, shareholders of the Fund may call 1-800-DIAL-SEI or write to the Fund at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456. Although the Trust does not post its annual or semi-annual reports on the Internet, the reports can be obtained from the SEC's website by visiting http://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml and selecting "Search for Company Filings."

The Trustees, including all of the Independent Trustees,
recommend that shareholders approve the Proposal.

PROMPT EXECUTION AND RETURN OF THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD(S) ARE REQUESTED. A SELF-ADDRESSED, POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE. YOU MAY ALSO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR BY LOGGING ON TO THE INTERNET. ANY UNMARKED EXECUTED PROXIES WITHOUT INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CONTRARY WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR OF APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSAL.


(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)




APPENDIX A

INVESTMENT SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENT
SEI INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS TRUST

AGREEMENT made as of this _____ day of _________, 2010 between SEI Investments Management Corporation (the "Adviser") and LSV Asset Management (the "Sub-Adviser").

WHEREAS, SEI Institutional Investments Trust, a Massachusetts business trust (the "Trust"), is registered as an open-end management investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"); and

WHEREAS, the Adviser has entered into an Investment Advisory Agreement dated June 14, 1996, as amended, (the "Advisory Agreement") with the Trust, pursuant to which the Adviser acts as investment adviser to each series of the Trust set forth on Schedule A attached hereto (each a "Fund,"“Nominee” and collectively, the "Funds"“Nominees”), as such Schedule may be amended by mutual agreement of the parties hereto; and

WHEREAS, the Adviser, with the approval of the Trust, desires to retain the Sub-Adviser to provide investment advisory services to the Adviser in connection with the management of a Fund, and the Sub-Adviser is willing to render such investment advisory services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.  Duties of the Sub-Adviser. Subject to supervision by the Adviser and the Trust's Board of Trustees, the Sub-Adviser shall manage all of the securities and other assets of each Fund entrusted to it hereunder (the "Assets"), including the purchase, retention and disposition of the Assets, in accordance with the Fund's investment objectives, policies and restrictions as stated in each Fund's prospectus and statement of additional information, as currently in effect and as amended or supplemented from time to time (referred to collectively as the "Prospectus"), and subject to the following:

(a)  The Sub-Adviser shall, in consultation with and subject to the direction of the Adviser, determine from time to time what Assets will be purchased, retained or sold by a Fund, and what portion of the Assets will be invested or held uninvested in cash.

(b)  In the performance of its duties and obligations under this Agreement, the Sub-Adviser shall act in conformity with the Trust's Declaration of Trust (as defined herein), Prospectus, Compliance Policies and Procedures and with the instructions and directions of the Adviser and of the Board of Trustees of the Trust and will conform to and comply with the requirements of the 1940 Act, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"), and all other applicable federal and state laws and regulations, as each is amended from time to time.Trusts.

(c)   The Sub-Adviser shall determine the Assets to be purchased or sold by a Fund as provided in subparagraph (a) and will place orders with or through such persons, brokers or dealers to carry out the policy with respect to brokerage set forth in a Fund's Prospectus or as the Board of Trustees or the Adviser may direct from time to time, in conformity with all federal securities laws. In executing Fund transactions and selecting brokers or dealers, the Sub-Adviser will use its best efforts to seek on behalf of each Fund the best overall terms available. In assessing the best overall terms available for any transaction, the Sub-Adviser shall consider all factors that it deems relevant, including the breadth of the market in the security, the price of the security, the financial condition and execution capability of the broker or dealer, and the reasonableness of the commission, if any, both for the specific transactio n and on a continuing basis. In evaluating the best overall terms available, and in selecting


the broker-dealer to execute a particular transaction, the Sub-Adviser may also consider the brokerage and research services provided (as those terms are defined in Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")). Consistent with any guidelines established by the Board of Trustees of the Trust and Section 28(e) of the Exchange Act, the Sub-Adviser is authorized to pay to a broker or dealer who provides such brokerage and research services a commission for executing a portfolio transaction for a Fund which is in excess of the amount of commission another broker or dealer would have charged for effecting that transaction if, but only if, the Sub-Adviser determines in good faith that such commission was reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided by such broker or dealer — viewed in terms of that particular transaction or in terms of the overall responsibilitie s of the Sub-Adviser to its discretionary clients, including a Fund. In addition, the Sub-Adviser is authorized to allocate purchase and sale orders for securities to brokers or dealers (including brokers and dealers that are affiliated with the Adviser, Sub-Adviser or the Trust's principal underwriter) if the Sub-Adviser believes that the quality of the transaction and the commission are comparable to what they would be with other qualified firms. In no instance, however, will a Fund's Assets be purchased from or sold to the Adviser, Sub-Adviser, the Trust's principal underwriter, or any affiliated person of either the Trust, Adviser, the Sub-Adviser or the principal underwriter, acting as principal in the transaction, except to the extent permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and the 1940 Act.

(d)  The Sub-Adviser shall maintain all books and records with respect to transactions involving the Assets required by subparagraphs (b)(5), (6), (7), (9), (10) and (11) and paragraph (f) of Rule 31a-1 under the 1940 Act. The Sub-Adviser shall keep the books and records relating to the Assets required to be maintained by the Sub-Adviser under this Agreement and shall timely furnish to the Adviser all information relating to the Sub-Adviser's services under this Agreement needed by the Adviser to keep the other books and records of a Fund required by Rule 31a-1 under the 1940 Act. The Sub-Adviser agrees that all records that it maintains on behalf of a Fund are property of the Fund and the Sub-Adviser will surrender promptly to a Fund any of such records upon the Fund's request; provided, however, that the Sub-Adviser may retain a copy of such records. In addition, for the duration of this Agreement, the Sub-Adviser sh all preserve for the periods prescribed by Rule 31a-2 under the 1940 Act any such records as are required to be maintained by it pursuant to this Agreement, and shall transfer said records to any successor sub-adviser upon the termination of this Agreement (or, if there is no successor sub-adviser, to the Adviser).

(e)  The Sub-Adviser shall provide a Fund's custodian on each business day with information relating to all transactions concerning a Fund's Assets and shall provide the Adviser with such information upon request of the Adviser.

(f)  To the extent called for by the Trust's Compliance Policies and Procedures, or as reasonably requested by a Fund, the Sub-Adviser shall provide the Fund with information and advice regarding Assets to assist the Fund in determining the appropriate valuation of such Assets.

(g)  The investment management services provided by the Sub-Adviser under this Agreement are not to be deemed exclusive and the Sub-Adviser shall be free to render similar services to others, as long as such services do not impair the services rendered to the Adviser or the Trust.

(h)  The Sub-Adviser shall promptly notify the Adviser of any financial condition that is reasonably likely to impair the Sub-Adviser's ability to fulfill its commitment under this Agreement.

(i)  (i)  Except under the circumstances set forth in subsection (ii), the Sub-Adviser shall not be responsible for reviewing proxy solicitation materials or voting and handling proxies in relation


to the securities held as Assets in a Fund. If the Sub-Adviser receives a misdirected proxy, it shall promptly forward such misdirected proxy to the Adviser.

 (ii)  The Sub-Adviser hereby agrees that upon 60 days' written notice from the Adviser, the Sub-Adviser shall assume responsibility for reviewing proxy solicitation materials and voting proxies in relation to the securities held as Assets in a Fund. As of the time the Sub-Adviser shall assume such responsibilities with respect to proxies under this sub-section (ii), the Adviser shall instruct the custodian and other parties providing services to a Fund to promptly forward misdirected proxies to the Sub-Adviser.

(j)  In performance of its duties and obligations under this Agreement, the Sub-Adviser shall not consult with any other sub-adviser to a Fund or a sub-adviser to a portfolio that is under common control with a Fund concerning the Assets, except as permitted by the policies and procedures of a Fund. The Sub-Adviser shall not provide investment advice to any assets of a Fund other than the Assets.Proposal 2:

(k)  On occasions when the Sub-Adviser deems the purchase or sale of a security to be in the best interest of a Fund as well as other clients of the Sub-Adviser, the Sub-Adviser may, to the extent permitted by applicable law and regulations, aggregate the order for securities to be sold or purchased. In such event, the Sub-Adviser will allocate securities so purchased or sold, as well as the expenses incurred in the transaction, in a manner the Sub-Adviser reasonably considers to be equitable and consistent with its fiduciary obligations to a Fund and to such other clients under the circumstances.

(l)  The Sub-Adviser shall provide to the Adviser or the Board of Trustees such periodic and special reports, balance sheets or financial information, and such other information with regard to its affairs as the Adviser or Board of Trustees may reasonably request. The Sub-Adviser shall also furnish to the Adviser any other information relating to the Assets that is required to be filed by the Adviser or the Trust with the SEC or sent to shareholders under the 1940 Act (including the rules adopted thereunder) or any exemptive or other relief that the Adviser or the Trust obtains from the SEC.

To amend the extent permitted by law, the services to be furnished by the Sub-Adviser under this Agreement may be furnished through the medium of any of the Sub-Adviser's partners, officers, employees or control affiliates; provided, however, that the use of such mediums does not relieve the Sub-Adviser from any obligation or duty under this Agreement.

2.  Duties of the Adviser. The Adviser shall continue to have responsibility for all services to be provided to each Fund pursuant to the Advisory Agreement and shall oversee and review the Sub-Adviser's performance of its duties under this Agreement; provided, however, that in connection with its management of the Assets, nothing herein shall be construed to relieve the Sub-Adviser of responsibility for compliance with the Trust's Declaration of Trust (as defined herein), Prospectus, Compliance Policies and Procedures, the instructions and directions of the Board of Trustees of the Trust, the requirements of the 1940 Act, the Code, and all other applicable federal and state laws and regulations, as each is amended from time to time.

3.  Delivery of Documents. The Adviser has furnished the Sub-Adviser with copies of each of the following documents:

(a)  The Trust's Agreement and Declaration of Trust as filed withfor each of SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT to reduce the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (such Agreement and Declaration of Trust, as in effect on the date of this Agreement and as amendedshareholder quorum requirement from time to time, herein called the "Declaration of Trust");

(b)  By-Laws of the Trust (such By-Laws, as in effect on the date of this Agreement and as amended from time to time, are herein called the "By-Laws"); and


(c)  Prospectus of each Fund.

4.  Compensation to the Sub-Adviser. For the services to be provided by the Sub-Adviser pursuant to this Agreement, the Adviser will pay the Sub-Adviser, and the Sub-Adviser agrees to accept as full compensation therefor, a sub-advisory fee at the rate specified in Schedule B which is attached hereto and made part of this Agreement. The fee will be calculated based on the average daily value of the Assets under the Sub-Adviser's management and will be paid to the Sub-Adviser monthly. For the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding the fact that the Agreement has not been terminated, no fee will be accrued under this Agreement with respect to any day that the value of the Assets under the Sub-Adviser's management equals zero. Except as may otherwise be prohibited by law or re gulation (including any then current SEC staff interpretation), the Sub-Adviser may, in its discretion and from time to time, waive a portion of its fee.

5.  Indemnification. The Sub-Adviser shall indemnify and hold harmless the Adviser from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities or damages (including reasonable attorney's fees and other related expenses) howsoever arising from or in connection with the performance of the Sub-Adviser's obligations under this Agreement; provided, however, that the Sub-Adviser's obligation under this Paragraph 5 shall be reduced to the extent that the claim against, or the loss, liability or damage experienced by the Adviser, is caused by or is otherwise directly related to the Adviser's own willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence, or to the reckless disregard of its duties under this Agreement.

The Adviser shall indemnify and hold harmless the Sub-Adviser from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities or damages (including reasonable attorney's fees and other related expenses) howsoever arising from or in connection with the performance of the Adviser's obligations under this Agreement; provided, however, that the Adviser's obligation under this Paragraph 5 shall be reduced to the extent that the claim against, or the loss, liability or damage experienced by the Sub-Adviser, is caused by or is otherwise directly related to the Sub-Adviser's own willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence, or to the reckless disregard of its duties under this Agreement.

6.  Duration and Termination. This Agreement shall become effective upon approval by the Trust's Board of Trustees, approval of the Agreement by a majority of the outstanding voting securities of a Fund and its execution by the parties hereto.

This Agreement shall continue in effect for a period of more than two years from the date hereof only so long as continuance is specifically approved at least annually in conformance with the 1940 Act; provided, however, that this Agreement may be terminated with respect to a Fund (a) by the Fund at any time, without the payment of any penalty, by the vote of a majority of Trustees of the Trust or by the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund, (b) by the Adviser at any time, without the payment of any penalty, on not more than 60 days' nor less than 30 days' written notice to the Sub-Adviser, or (c) by the Sub-Adviser at any time, without the payment of any penalty, on 90 days' written notice to the Adviser. This Agreement shall terminate automatically and immediately in the event of its assignment, or in the event of a termination of the Advisory Agreement with the Trust. As used in this Paragraph 6 , the terms "assignment" and "vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities" shall have the respective meanings set forth in the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, subject to such exceptions as may be granted by the SEC under the 1940 Act.

7.  Compliance Program of the Sub-Adviser. The Sub-Adviser hereby represents and warrants that:

(a)  in accordance with Rule 206(4)-7 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"), the Sub-Adviser has adopted and implemented and will maintain written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation by the Sub-Adviser and its supervised persons (as


such term is defined in the Advisers Act) of the Advisers Act and the rules the SEC has adopted under the Advisers Act; and

(b)  to the extent that the Sub-Adviser's activities or services could affect a Fund, the Sub-Adviser has adopted and implemented and will maintain written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to prevent violation of the "federal securities laws" (as such term is defined in Rule 38a-1 under the 1940 Act) by the Funds and the Sub-Adviser (the policies and procedures referred to in this Paragraph 7(b), along with the policies and procedures referred to in Paragraph 7(a), are referred to herein as the Sub-Adviser's "Compliance Program"one-third (33-1/3%).

8.  Reporting of Compliance Matters.

(a)  The Sub-Adviser shall promptly provide to the Trust's Chief Compliance Officer ("CCO") the following documents:

  (i)  copies of all SEC examination correspondences, including correspondences regarding books and records examinations and "sweep" examinations, issued during the term of this Agreement, in which the SEC identified any concerns, issues or matters (such correspondences are commonly referred to as "deficiency letters") relating to any aspect of the Sub-Adviser's investment advisory business and the Sub-Adviser's responses thereto;

  (ii)  a report of any material violations of the Sub-Adviser's Compliance Program or any "material compliance matters" (as such term is defined in Rule 38a-1 under the 1940 Act) that have occurred with respect to the Sub-Adviser's Compliance Program;

  (iii)  a report of any material changes to the policies and procedures that compose the Sub-Adviser's Compliance Program;

  (iv)  a copy of the Sub-Adviser's chief compliance officer's report (or similar document(s) which serve the same purpose) regarding his or her annual review of the Sub-Adviser's Compliance Program, as required by Rule 206(4)-7 under the Advisers Act; and

  (v)  an annual (or more frequently as the Trust's CCO may reasonably request) representation regarding the Sub-Adviser's compliance with Paragraphs 7 and 8 of this Agreement.

(b)  The Sub-Adviser shall also provide the Trust's CCO with:

  (i)  reasonable read-only access to the testing, analyses, reports and other documentation, or summaries thereof, that the Sub-Adviser's chief compliance officer relies upon to monitor the effectiveness of the implementation of the Sub-Adviser's Compliance Program; and

  (ii)  reasonable access, during normal business hours, to the Sub-Adviser's facilities for the purpose of conducting pre-arranged on-site compliance related due diligence meetings with personnel of the Sub-Adviser.

9.  Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, without regard to conflict of law principles; provided, however, that nothing herein shall be construed as being inconsistent with the 1940 Act.

10.  Severability. Should any part of this Agreement be held invalid by a court decision, statute, rule or otherwise, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors.


11.  Notice. Any notice, advice or report to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed sufficient if delivered or mailed by registered, certified or overnight mail, postage prepaid addressed by the party giving notice to the other party at the last address furnished by the other party:

To the Adviser at:SEI Investments Management Corporation
One Freedom Valley Drive
Oaks, PA 19456
Attention: Legal Department
To the Trust's CCO at:SEI Investments Management Corporation
One Freedom Valley Drive
Oaks, PA 19456
Attention: Russ Emery
To the Sub-Adviser at:LSV Asset Management
155 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 4600
Chicago, IL 60606
Attention: COO

12.  Amendment of Agreement. This Agreement may be amended only by written agreement of the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser and only in accordance with the provisions of the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

13.  Entire Agreement. This Agreement embodies the entire agreement and understanding between the parties hereto, and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings relating to this Agreement's subject matter. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but such counterparts shall, together, constitute only one instrument.

In the event the terms of this Agreement are applicable to more than one portfolio of the Trust (for purposes of this Paragraph 13, each a "Fund"), the Adviser is entering into this Agreement with the Sub-Adviser on behalf of the respective Funds severally and not jointly, with the express intention that the provisions contained in each numbered paragraph hereof shall be understood as applying separately with respect to each Fund as if contained in separate agreements between the Adviser and Sub-Adviser for each such Fund. In the event that this Agreement is made applicable to any additional Funds by way of a Schedule executed subsequent to the date first indicated above, provisions of such Schedule shall be deemed to be incorporated into this Agreement as it relates to such Fund so that, for example, the execution date for purposes of Paragraph 6 of this Agreement with respect to such Fund shall be the execution date of the rel evant Schedule.

14.  Miscellaneous.

(a)  A copy of the Declaration of Trust is on file with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and notice is hereby given that the obligations of this instrument are not binding upon any of the Trustees, officers or shareholders of a Fund or the Trust.

(b)  Where the effect of a requirement of the 1940 Act or Advisers Act reflected in any provision of this Agreement is altered by a rule, regulation or order of the SEC, whether of special or general application, such provision shall be deemed to incorporate the effect of such rule, regulation or order.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their officers designated below as of the day and year first written above.

SEI Investments Management CorporationLSV Asset Management
By:By:
Name:Name:
Title:Title:


Schedule A
to the
Sub-Advisory Agreement
between
SEI Investments Management Corporation
and
LSV Asset Management
As of ________ ___, 2010

SEI INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS TRUST

U.S. Managed Volatility Fund


Schedule B
to the
Sub-Advisory Agreement
between
SEI Investments Management Corporation
and
LSV Asset Management
As of ________ ___, 2010

Pursuant to Paragraph 4, the Adviser shall pay the Sub-Adviser compensation at an annual rate as follows:

SEI Institutional Investments Trust

U.S. Managed Volatility Fund0.25%

 

SEI Investments Management CorporationLSV Asset Management
By:By:
Name:Name:
Title:Title:



PROXY CARD

The Board, including the Independent Trustees, unanimously recommends that shareholders of the Funds vote in favor of each Proposal.

Proposal 1 — Election of Trustees

For Proposal 1, you are being asked to elect each of the seven current Trustees of the Trusts, as well as elect one new Trustee.  Proposal 1 arises from legal requirements that apply to mutual funds, such as the Funds.  Specifically, the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates mutual funds (the “1940 Act”) requires that, after the addition of a new trustee, more than two-thirds of a registered investment company’s board of trustees must have been elected by shareholders. The Board currently consists of seven Trustees, five of whom were elected by shareholders.  Two of the current Trustees, Mr. Harris and Mr. Johnson, were appointed by the Trustees then in office. After the appointment of Mr. Harris and Mr. Johnson, more than two-thirds of the Trustees had been elected by shareholders.  At this point, however, the Board is unable to appoint a new Trustee to the Board because immediately after such appointment, less than two-thirds of the Trustees would have been elected by shareholders. Therefore, shareholder approval of either a new Trustee or one of the two current Trustees that was not previously elected is required before the new Trustee can be added.

Effective August 31, 2015, pursuant to its authority under each Trust’s Agreement and Declaration of Trust, the Board unanimously approved an increase in the number of Trustees that comprise the Board of each Trust to eight.  At a meeting of the Board on September 15, 2015, the Board unanimously voted to recommend that shareholders of the Trusts elect Ms. Susan Cote as a new Independent Trustee of the Trusts and also to elect the existing seven Trustees of each Trust.

Although not required by applicable law or each Trust’s governing documents, the Board, for reasons of efficiency and to attempt to reduce future costs and expenses of the Funds, has determined that it is in the best interests of the Funds to seek the election by shareholders of all seven current Trustees.  If Ms. Cote and all of the seven current Trustees are elected, following the Meeting, all eight Trustees of the Trusts will have been elected by shareholders.  This will likely permit the Board to appoint several new or replacement Trustees over time before next having to incur the costly expense of a proxy solicitation.

If a plurality of voting shareholders of a Trust does not elect Ms. Cote, then Ms. Cote will not become a Trustee and the Board may, immediately or at a later time, consider re-proposing Ms. Cote for election or finding a replacement candidate.  Ms. Cote is currently serving as an independent consultant to the Board pursuant to a written agreement that is renewable upon agreement of the parties.  If Ms. Cote is not elected by shareholders, she may continue to serve in her capacity as an independent consultant to the Board.

If, however, a plurality of voting shareholders of a Trust do not elect any or all of the current Trustees, such vote will not impact the composition of the Board, but may result in higher costs and expenses of the Funds in the future.

2



Matters Considered by the Board

At its quarterly in-person meeting held on September 15, 2015 (the “Board Meeting”), the Board, including the Committees of the Board and the Independent Trustees, were provided with information regarding the Proposals and considered whether to recommend that shareholders vote for the Proposals.  Based on information provided to the Board during and in advance of the Board Meeting and subsequent review and consideration, the Board unanimously voted, within the context of its full deliberations, to recommend that shareholders of the Funds vote in favor of (i) the proposal to elect Ms. Susan Cote as a new Independent Trustee and elect all seven current Trustees of the Trusts, and (ii) the proposal to amend the Agreement and Declaration of Trust for each of SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement from a majority to one-third (33-1/3%).

Prior to the Board Meeting, the Board considered whether to increase the size of the Board and fix the number of Trustees that compose the Board at eight.  In this capacity, the Board considered and discussed, among other things, information about the current Trustees’ capacity, their expected length of service, the number, size and complexity of the Funds, the number of sub-advisers to the Funds, and the growth trajectory of the Trusts.  Based on its review and deliberation, the Board, by unanimous written consent dated as of August 31, 2015, determined to increase the size of the Board to eight Trustees.

In considering candidates to serve as a new Independent Trustee, the Board and its Governance Committee generally considered each potential candidate’s educational background, business or professional experience, and reputation.  In addition, the Governance Committee evaluated each candidate’s qualifications for Board membership and the independence of such candidates from the investment advisers and other principal service providers for the Funds as well as any relationships beyond those delineated in the 1940 Act that might impair independence.  The Board and the Governance Committee also considered each candidate’s expertise with respect to financial and accounting matters and the age and expertise of the current Trustees.  Ms. Cote’s experience and qualifications are discussed below.

In determining to recommend that shareholders vote in favor of electing Ms. Cote to the Board, in addition to Ms. Cote’s qualifications and experience, the Board determined (1) that Ms. Cote is sufficiently independent from relationships with SEI Investments Management Corporation (“SIMC”), which is the Funds’ investment adviser, and other principal service providers of the Funds, both within the terms and the spirit of the statutory independence requirements specified under the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder; (2) that Ms. Cote demonstrated an ability and willingness to make the considerable time commitment, including personal attendance at Board meetings, believed necessary to function as an effective Board member; and (3) that Ms. Cote has no continuing relationship as a director, officer or board member of any U.S. registered investment company other than those within the SEI fund complex.  The Board also considered the fact that the Board appointed Ms. Cote to four affiliated trusts effective as of August 31, 2015 and that if Ms. Cote was elected as a Trustee to the Trusts, the Trusts would have the benefit of being able to share resources with those affiliated trusts for which Ms. Cote already serves as trustee.  The Governance Committee has not adopted any specific policy on the issue of diversity, but may take this into account, among other factors, in its consideration of any new candidates to the Board.

In considering whether to recommend that shareholders elect the seven current Trustees, the Board considered and discussed information about the 1940 Act voting requirements, the potential to mitigate future costs, and the flexibility that may be created with respect to the future appointment of Trustees to the Board if shareholders elect the current Trustees.  The Board also considered its current composition, including its individual and collective educational background and business and professional experience.  The Board also considered the fact that because the Funds would have to undertake the costs of a proxy in

3



order to elect Ms. Cote as a new Trustee to the Board, the Funds would be able to significantly capitalize on economies of scale in electing the current Trustees alongside Ms. Cote as a slate of nominees for the Board.

If shareholders elect Ms. Cote, it is anticipated that she will begin to serve the Trusts as an Independent Trustee immediately after the shareholder meeting.  Irrespective of whether shareholders elect the seven current Trustees, all seven current Trustees will continue to serve as Trustees without interruption.

Individual Nominee Qualifications

The Board has concluded to recommend to shareholders that each of the Nominees should be elected to the Board because of his or her ability to review and understand information about the Funds, identify and request other information relevant to the performance of his or her duties, question management and other service providers regarding material factors bearing on the management and administration of the Funds, and exercise his or her business judgment in a manner that serves the best interests of the Trusts’ shareholders. The Board has concluded that each of the Nominees should serve as a Trustee based on his or her own experience, qualifications, attributes and skills as described below.

Susan Cote spent 18 years as a partner at Ernst & Young LLP, including nine years as the firm’s Global Asset Management Assurance Leader, and seven years as the Americas Director of Asset Management.  Prior to joining Ernst & Young, Ms. Cote spent 14 years serving in various roles in the asset management business of Prudential, including roles as Fund Treasurer, Chief Operating Officer and Managing Director.  Prior to that, Ms. Cote worked at KPMG.  The Board has concluded that Susan Cote should be elected to serve as Trustee because of her education, knowledge of financial services and investment management, and 18 years of experience as a partner at a major accounting firm, and other professional experienced gained through her prior employment.

[Robert A. Nesher has served as Chairman of the Board of Trustees since 1982.  The Board has concluded that Mr. Nesher should be elected to continue to serve as Trustee because of the experience he has gained in his various roles with SEI Investments Company, which he joined in 1974, his knowledge of and experience in the financial services industry, and the experience he has gained serving as Trustee of the Trusts.]

William Doran has served as a Trustee of the Trusts since 1982.  From October 1976 to October 2003, Mr. Doran was a partner in the law firm of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA, a firm that provides significant legal services to SIMC, its affiliates and the SEI Funds. He has been a consultant to the firm since then. Mr. Doran has been a director of SEI Investments Company since March 1985. Mr. Doran is also a director of a number of subsidiaries of SEI Investments Company, including the Trusts’ Distributor. Mr. Doran is also a trustee of several other investment companies for which affiliates of SIMC act as administrator and/or distributor. The Board has concluded that Mr. Doran should be elected to continue to serve as Trustee because of the experience he gained serving as a Partner in the Investment Management and Securities Industry Practice of a large law firm, his experience in and knowledge of the financial services industry, and the experience he has gained serving as Trustee of the Trusts.

George J. Sullivan, Jr. has served as a Trustee since 1996 and as Lead Independent Trustee since 2011.  Mr. Sullivan serves as a Trustee and Chairman of the Audit Committee of State Street Navigator Securities Lending Trust, a regulated investment company. Prior to that, he served as Chief Operating Officer of a hedge fund adviser, General Partner of Teton Partners, L.P., a global hedge fund and Senior Vice President responsible for fund accounting at Fidelity Investments. Mr. Sullivan is a certified public accountant, alumnus of Price Waterhouse Coopers and a graduate of Boston College. He was a member of the Executive Committee of the Independent Directors Council through September, 2015.  The Board has concluded that Mr. Sullivan should be elected to continue to serve as Trustee because of the experience he gained as a certified public accountant and financial consultant, his experience in and knowledge of public company accounting and auditing and the financial services industry, the experience he gained as an officer of a large financial services firm in its operations department, and the experience he has gained serving as Trustee of the Trusts.

Nina Lesavoy has served as a Trustee since 2003.  Ms. Lesavoy is the Founder of Avec Capital and has served as its Managing Director since 2008. Prior to that, she served as Managing Director of Cue Capital from 2002 to 2008. Previously, she was Chief Sales Officer and Managing Partner of InvestorForce, Inc. from 2000 to December 2001, and was Head of Sales and Client Service at Chancellor Capital and later LGT Asset Management from 1986 to 2000.  The Board has concluded that Ms. Lesavoy should be elected and continue to serve as Trustee because of the experience she gained as a Director of several private equity fundraising firms and marketing and selling a wide

4



range of investment products to institutional investors, her experience in and knowledge of the financial services industry, and the experience she has gained serving as Trustee of the Trusts.

James Williams has served as a Trustee of the Trusts since 2004.  Mr, Williams has been the Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of the J. Paul Getty Trust since December 2002 and Treasurer since 2006. Before joining the Getty, Mr. Williams spent three years as the president of Harbor Capital Advisors and president of the Harbor Fund’s family of mutual funds. Prior to that, he was manager of the pension asset management department of Ford Motor Company. The Board has concluded that Mr. Williams should be elected and continue to serve as Trustee because of the experience he gained as Chief Investment Officer of a non-profit foundation, the President of an investment management firm, the President of a registered investment company and the Manager of a public company’s pension assets, his experience in and knowledge of the financial services industry, and the experience he has gained serving as Trustee of the Trusts.

Mitchell Johnson has served as a Trustee since 2007.  Mr. Johnson formerly was President of MAJ Capital Management, Inc., an investment management firm that he founded in 1994 following his retirement from the Student Loan Marketing Association (“Sallie Mae”). During his 21 years with Sallie Mae, Mr. Johnson held numerous positions within that organization including, for the seven years preceding his retirement, Senior Vice President, Corporate Finance.  The Board has concluded that Mr. Johnson should be elected and continue to serve as Trustee because of the experience he gained as a senior vice president, corporate finance, of a Fortune 500 Company, his experience in and knowledge of the financial services and banking industries, the experience he gained serving as a director of other mutual funds, and the experience he has gained serving as Trustee of the Trusts since 2007.

Hubert L. Harris, Jr. has served as a Trustee since 2008.  Mr. Harris previously served as CEO of Invesco North America and Chairman of Invesco Retirement Services, and served on the board of directors of Invesco from 1993 to 2004. From 1983 to 1988, Mr. Harris was President and Executive Director of the International Association for Financial Planning. Mr. Harris also served as the Assistant Director of the Office of Management and Budget in Washington, D.C. from 1977 to 1980. Since 1992, Mr. Harris has owned and operated Harris Plantation, Inc., a cattle, hay and timber business. Mr. Harris has served on the Board of Directors of Aaron’s, Inc, since 2012. Mr. Harris is on the Board of Councilors of the Carter Center, and he previously served as a director of a bank holding company, chair of the Georgia Tech Foundation, chair of the Georgia Tech Alumni Association and on the board of other non-profit organizations.  The Board has concluded that Mr. Harris should be elected and continue to serve as Trustee because of the experience he gained as Chief Executive Officer and Director of an investment management firm, the experience he gained serving on the Board of a public company, his experience in and knowledge of the financial services and banking industries, and the experience he has gained serving as Trustee of the Trusts since 2008.

In its periodic assessment of the effectiveness of the Board, the Board considers the complementary individual skills and experience of the individual Trustees primarily in the broader context of the Board’s overall composition so that the Board, as a body, possesses the appropriate (and appropriately diverse) skills and experience to oversee the business of the Trusts. Moreover, references to the qualifications, attributes and skills of Nominees are pursuant to requirements of the SEC, do not constitute holding out of the Board or any Nominee as having any special expertise or experience, and shall not be deemed to impose any greater responsibility or liability on any such person or on the Board by reason thereof.

The tables below show information about the Nominees, including each of the current Trustees.  For purposes of their duties as current Trustees, the address of each individual listed below is One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456.

 

SEI INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS TRUSTName and
Age

Position(s)
Held with
the Trusts

SEI INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS TRUST

C/O PROXY TABULATOR

P.O. BOX 9112

FARMINGDALE, NY 11735

To Vote by Internet

1) Read the Proxy Statement and have the proxy card below at hand.

2) Go to: www.proxyvote.com.

3) Follow the on-line instructions.

To Vote by Telephone

1) Read the Proxy Statement and have the proxy card below at hand.

2) Call 1-800-690-6903.

3) Follow the recorded instructions.

To Vote by Mail

1) Read the Proxy Statement.

2) Check the appropriate box on the proxy card below.

3) Sign and date the proxy card.

4) Return the proxy card in the envelope provided.

If you vote by Telephone or Internet, please do not return your proxy card.

Term of
Office and
Length of
Time
Served(1)

Principal
Occupation(s)
During Past 5
Years

Number of
Portfolios in
Trust Complex
to be Overseen
by Nominee(2)

Other Directorships Held by
Director or Nominee for Director

Nominees for Interested Trustees (Current Trustees)

 

Robert A. Nesher

 

 

Important Notice RegardingChairman of the AvailabilityBoard of Proxy Materials for the Special Meeting:

 

Since 1982

Currently performs various services on

104

Trustee of The Proxy Statement is available at www.proxyvote.com.Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund, The Advisors’ Inner Circle

 

5



 

68 yrs. old

Trustees

behalf of SEI for which Mr. Nesher is compensated.

Fund II, Bishop Street Funds, Director of SEI Global Master Fund, plc, SEI Global Assets Fund, plc, SEI Global Investments Fund, plc, SEI Investments Global, Limited, SEI Investments — Global Fund Services, Limited, SEI Investments (Europe), Limited, SEI Global Nominee Ltd., SEI Structured Credit Fund, L.P.

William M. Doran

75 yrs. old

Trustee

Since 1982

Self-Employed Consultant since 2003. Partner at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP (law firm) from 1976 to 2003, counsel to the Trust, SEI Investments, SIMC, the Administrator and the Distributor. Secretary of SEI since 1978

104

Trustee of The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund, The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund II, The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund III, Bishop Street Funds, Director of SEI since 1985. Director of the Distributor since 2003. Director of SEI Investments — Global Fund Services, Limited, SEI Investments Global, Limited, SEI Investments (Europe), Limited, SEI Investments (Asia) and SEI Global Nominee Ltd., Limited.

Nominees for Independent Trustees (Current Trustees)

George J. Sullivan, Jr.

72 yrs. old

Trustee

Since 1996

Retired since January 2012. Self-employed Consultant, Newfound Consultants Inc., April 1997-December 2011

104

Trustee of The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund, The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund II, Bishop Street Funds, State Street Navigator Securities Lending Trust, and SEI INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS TRUSTStructured Credit Fund, L.P., member of the independent review committee for SEI’s Canadian-registered mutual funds.

Nina Lesavoy

57 yrs. old

Trustee

Since 2003

Founder and Managing Director, Avec Capital since April 2008

104

Director of SEI Structured Credit Fund, L.P.

James M. Williams

68 yrs. old

Trustee

Since 2004

Vice President and Chief Investment Officer, J. Paul Getty Trust, Non Profit Foundation for Visual Arts, since December 2002

104

Trustee/Director of Ariel Mutual Funds, and SEI Structured Credit Fund, L.P.

Mitchell A. Johnson

73 yrs. old

Trustee

Since 2007

Private Investor since 1994.

104

Trustee of the Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund, The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund II, and Bishop Street Funds

Hubert L. Harris, Jr.

72 yrs. old

Trustee

Since 2008

Retired since December 2005. Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board of Directors, AMVESCAP Retirement, Inc., 1997-December 2005. Chief Executive Officer, INVESCO North America, September 2003-December 

104

Director of Aaron’s Inc.

6



2005.

Nominee for Independent Trustee (New Trustee)

Susan C. Cote

60 yrs. old

None

n/a

Retired since July 2015. Americas Director of Asset Management, Ernst & Young LLP, 2006-2013; Global Asset Management Assurance Leader, Ernst & Young LLP, 2006-2015; Partner, Ernst & Young LLP, 1997-2015; Prudential, 1983-1997.

104

Member, Ernst & Young LLP Retirement Investment Committee; Treasurer and Chair of Finance, Investment and Audit Committee, New York Women’s Foundation


(1)                           Each Trustee shall hold office during the lifetime of this Trust until the election and qualification of his or her successor, or until he or she sooner dies, resigns or is removed in accordance with the Trust’s Declaration of Trust.

(2)                           This proxy is not being sent to the following four Trusts: SEI Insurance Products Trust, Adviser Managed Trust, New Covenant Funds and SEI Catholic Values Trust. However, the funds that are a series of these 4 Trusts have been included in the number of portfolios in the Fund Complex overseen by the nominees. The Fund Complex consists of U.S. registered investment companies advised or serviced by SIMC. The Fund Complex comprises 11 total Trusts, which, in turn, comprise 104 total series, each of which is considered a separate mutual fund.

The tables below show the number of shares of each Fund beneficially owned by each Nominee as of [October 16], 2015. Unless otherwise noted, each Nominee owns less than 1% of the outstanding shares of each Series.

Interested Trustees

 

PROXY FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS – Name of
Nominee

NOVEMBER 2, 2010Dollar range of Equity
Securities in a Fund

Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in
All Series to be Overseen by Nominee in Family
of Investment Companies

Robert A. Nesher

[XX]

[XX]

William M. Doran

[XX]

[XX]

Independent Trustees

 

U.S. Managed VolatilityName of
Nominee

Dollar range of Equity
Securities in a Fund (the “Fund”

Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in
All Series to be Overseen by Nominee in Family
of Investment Companies

George J. Sullivan, Jr.

[XX]

[XX]

Nina Lesavoy

[XX]

[XX]

James M. Williams

[XX]

[XX]

Mitchell A. Johnson

[XX]

[XX]

Hubert L. Harris, Jr.

[XX]

[XX]

Susan C. Cote

[XX]

[XX]

7



Role of the Board

The management and affairs of each Trust and their respective series are overseen by the Trustees. The Board approves contracts under which certain companies provide essential management services to the Trusts.  Like most mutual funds, the day-to-day business of the Trusts, including the management of risk, is performed by third party service providers, such as SIMC, a distributor and an administrator. The Board is responsible for overseeing the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by SIMC and the various sub-advisers and receives information about those services at its regular meetings. In addition, in connection with its consideration of whether to annually renew the advisory agreements between each Trust, on behalf of the Funds that are a series of the respective Trust, and SIMC and the various sub-advisory agreements between SIMC and the sub-advisers with respect to the Funds, the Board annually meets with SIMC and, at least every three years, meets with the sub-advisers to review such services. Among other things, the Board regularly considers the sub-advisers’ adherence to the Funds’ investment restrictions and compliance with various Fund policies and procedures and with applicable securities regulations. The Board also reviews information about the Funds’ investments, including, for example, portfolio holdings schedules and reports on the Adviser’s use of derivatives and illiquid securities in managing the Funds.

The Trusts’ Chief Compliance Officer reports regularly to the Board to review and discuss compliance issues and Fund, SIMC and sub-adviser risk assessments. At least annually, the Trusts’ Chief Compliance Officer provides the Board with a report on each Trust reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of each Trust’s policies and procedures and those of its service providers, including SIMC and the various sub-advisers. The reports address the operation of the policies and procedures of the Trusts and each service provider since the date of the last report; any material changes to the policies and procedures since the date of the last report; any recommendations for material changes to the policies and procedures; and any material compliance matters since the date of the last report.

The Board receives reports from the Funds’ service providers regarding operational risks and risks related to the valuation and liquidity of portfolio securities. The Trusts’ Fair Value Pricing Committee provides regular reports to the Board concerning investments for which market prices are not readily available or may be unreliable. Annually, the independent registered public accounting firm reviews with the Audit Committee its audit of the Funds’ financial statements, focusing on major areas of risk encountered by the Funds and noting any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the Funds’ internal controls. Additionally, the Board oversees Fund management’s implementation of disclosure controls and procedures, which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Trusts in their periodic reports with the SEC are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods. The Board also oversees the Trusts’ internal controls over financial reporting, which comprise policies and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the Trusts’ financial reporting and the preparation of the Trusts’ financial statements.

Board Committees

There are three Committees of the Trusts’ Board of Trustees: the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee and the Fair Value Pricing Committee.

The Board has a standing Audit Committee that is composed of each of the Independent Trustees of the Trust. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board. The principal responsibilities of the Audit Committee include: (i) recommending which firm to engage as each Trust’s independent auditor and whether to terminate this relationship; (ii) reviewing the independent auditor’s compensation, the proposed scope and terms of its engagement and the firm’s independence; (iii) pre-approving audit and non-audit services provided by each Trust’s independent auditor to the Trust and certain other affiliated entities; (iv) serving as a channel of communication between the independent auditor and the Trustees; (v) reviewing the results of each external audit, including any qualifications in the independent auditor’s opinion, any related management letter, management’s responses to recommendations made by the independent auditor in connection with the audit, reports submitted to the Audit Committee by the internal auditing department of each Trust’s administrator that are material to the Trust as a whole, if any, and management’s responses to any such reports; (vi) reviewing each Trust’s audited financial statements and considering any significant disputes between the Trust’s management and the independent auditor that arose in connection with the preparation of those financial statements; (vii) considering, in consultation with the independent auditor and each Trust’s senior internal accounting executive, if any, the independent auditor’s report on the adequacy of the Trust’s internal financial controls; (viii) reviewing, in consultation with each Trust’s independent auditor, major changes regarding auditing and accounting principles and practices to be followed when preparing the

8



Trust’s financial statements; and (ix) other audit related matters. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for the oversight of each Trust’s compliance program. Messrs. Sullivan, Williams, Johnson and Harris, and Ms. Lesavoy currently serve as members of the Audit Committee. If Ms. Cote is elected by shareholders, it is expected that the Board would appoint her to the Audit Committee.  The Audit Committee meets periodically, as necessary, and met four (4) times during the 2014 calendar year.

The Board has a standing Governance Committee that is composed of each of the Independent Trustees of the Trust. The Governance Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board. The principal responsibilities of the Governance Committee include: (i) considering and reviewing Board governance and compensation issues; (ii) conducting a self assessment of the Board’s operations; (iii) selecting and nominating all persons to serve as independent Trustees and evaluating the qualifications of “interested” (as that term is defined under the 1940 Act) Trustee candidates; and (iv) reviewing shareholder recommendations for nominations to fill vacancies on the Board if such recommendations are submitted in writing and addressed to the Governance Committee at the applicable Trust’s offices. Messrs. Sullivan, Williams, Johnson and Harris, and Ms. Lesavoy currently serve as members of the Governance Committee. If Ms. Cote is elected by shareholders, it is expected that the Board would appoint her to the Governance Committee.  The Governance Committee shall meet at the direction of its Chair as often as appropriate to accomplish its purpose. In any event, the Governance Committee shall meet at least once each year and shall conduct at least one meeting in person. The Governance Committee met four (4) times during the 2014 calendar year.

The Board has a standing Fair Value Pricing Committee (also referred to as the Fair Value Committee) that is composed of at least one Trustee and various representatives of the Trusts’ service providers, as appointed by the Board. The Fair Value Pricing Committee operates under procedures approved by the Board. The principal responsibility of the Fair Value Pricing Committee is to determine the fair value of securities for which current market quotations are not readily available. The Fair Value Pricing Committee’s determinations are reviewed by the Board. Messrs. Nesher and Sullivan currently serve as the Board’s delegates on the Fair Value Pricing Committee. The Fair Value Pricing Committee meets periodically, as necessary, and met [XX] ([XX]) times during the 2014 calendar year.

Compensation Of Trustees And Officers

The Interested Trustees and the officers of the Trusts do not receive compensation from the Trust, except that a portion of the Trusts’ CCO’s salary is paid by the Trusts. Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee for services provided to the Trusts.  The chart below provides information about the total compensation accrued and payable to the Independent Trustees by each Trust and the Fund Complex for each Trust’s most recently completed fiscal year.  (Please note: The Fund Complex currently consists of 104 portfolios of the following Trusts: SEI Asset Allocation Trust, SEI Daily Income Trust, SEI Institutional International Trust, SEI Institutional Investments Trust, SEI Institutional Managed Trust, SEI Tax Exempt Trust, SEI Insurance Products Trust, SEI Catholic Values Trust, Adviser Managed Trust and New Covenant Funds. This proxy is not being sent to shareholders of SEI Insurance Products Trust, SEI Catholic Values Trust, Adviser Managed Trust and New Covenant Funds because the Proposals do not apply to those trusts. Accordingly, compensation charts for those four trusts have not been provided).

The chart below provides information about the total compensation paid to the Independent Trustees and the Trusts’ CCO by each Trust for the fiscal year indicated.

Name of Person,
Position

Aggregate
Compensation
from the Trust

Pension or Retirement
Benefits Accrued as

The undersigned shareholderPart of the U.S.Trust Expenses

Estimated Annual
Benefits Upon
Retirement

Total Compensation
From Fund Complex

SEI Institutional Managed Volatility Fund (the “Fund”) of Trust (September 30, 2014 fiscal year end)

George J. Sullivan, Jr.

$

[71,942]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Nina Lesavoy

$

[63,669]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

James M. Williams

$

[63,669]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Mitchell A. Johnson

$

[63,669]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Hubert L. Harris, Jr.

$

[63,669]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

SEI Institutional International Trust (September 30, 2014 fiscal year end)

George J. Sullivan, Jr.

$

[71,942]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

9



Nina Lesavoy

$

[63,669]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

James M. Williams

$

[63,669]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Mitchell A. Johnson

$

[63,669]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Hubert L. Harris, Jr.

$

[63,669]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

SEI Institutional Investments Trust (“SIIT”), hereby appoints Timothy D. Barto, Esq., Aaron C. Buser, Esq. and David F. McCann, Esq., and each of them, the attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote, as indicated herein, all of the shares of beneficial interest of the Fund standing in the name of the undersigned at the close of business on September 3, 2010, at a Special Meeting of Shareholders to be held at the offices of SEI Investments Management Corporation (“SIMC”) at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456, at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time, on November 2, 2010, and at any and all adjournments thereof (the “Meeting”), with all of the powers the undersigned would possess if then and there personally present and especially (but without limiting the general authorization and power hereby given) to vote as indicated on the proposal, as more fully described in the Proxy Statement for the Meeting.(May 31, 2015 fiscal year end)

 

If you sign the proxy card without otherwise indicating a vote on the proposal, the proxies will vote “FOR” the proposal listed on the reverse side. As to any other matter that may properly come before the Meeting, the shares will be voted by the proxies in accordance with their judgment.  The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of the Meeting and the Proxy Statement.

 

PLEASE SIGN AND DATE ON THE REVERSE SIDE.

 

 

TO VOTE, MARK BOX BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:x

 

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.George J. Sullivan, Jr.

$

[61,631]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Nina Lesavoy

$

[54,535]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

James M. Williams

$

[54,535]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Mitchell A. Johnson

$

[54,535]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Hubert L. Harris, Jr.

$

[54,535]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

SEI Tax Exempt Trust (August 31, 2015 fiscal year end)

George J. Sullivan, Jr.

$

[25,000]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Nina Lesavoy

$

[22,000]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

James M. Williams

$

[22,000]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Mitchell A. Johnson

$

[22,000]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Hubert L. Harris, Jr.

$

[22,000]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

SEI Daily Income Trust (January 31, 2015 fiscal year end)

George J. Sullivan, Jr.

$

[28,000]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Nina Lesavoy

$

[26,000]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

James M. Williams

$

[26,000]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Mitchell A. Johnson

$

[26,000]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Hubert L. Harris, Jr.

$

[26,000]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

SEI Asset Allocation Trust (March 31, 2015 fiscal year end)

George J. Sullivan, Jr.

$

[10,745]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Nina Lesavoy

$

[9,563]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

James M. Williams

$

[9,613]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Mitchell A. Johnson

$

[9,506]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

Hubert L. Harris, Jr.

$

[9,619]

N/A

N/A

$

[XX]

THE BOARD, INCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES, UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES.

10



Proposal 2 — Reduce Quorum for Shareholder Meetings

(SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT Only)

Proposal 2 is asking shareholders of those Funds that are a series of SIMT, SIT, STET or SDIT to vote to amend each Trust’s Agreement and Declaration of Trust to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement from a majority to one-third (33-1/3%).  After careful consideration, the Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the Funds of SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement.

Presently, in order for shareholders of the Funds that are a series of SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT to vote on a matter, a majority of the shares entitled to vote constitutes a quorum. A quorum represents the number of shareholders that must be present at a meeting, in person or by proxy, for a shareholder vote taken at the meeting to be valid. The present quorum requirement places considerable cost burdens on those Funds due to the expenses related to proxy voting.  It is generally quite difficult to get shareholders to vote in connection with a shareholder meeting.  Given the diverse and widely held shareholder base for the SEI Funds, it is very costly and time consuming to get a quorum of shareholders.  These costs include printing and mailing follow-up requests asking shareholders to vote, and retaining third-party proxy solicitation firms to directly contact shareholders and ask them to vote.  Further, there is a risk that a shareholder vote on an important matter is essentially unobtainable as a result of the difficulties in getting a majority of shareholders to vote.  Therefore, the Board recommends that shareholders approve the proposal to amend the Agreement and Declaration of Trust for each of SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement from a majority to one-third (33-1/3%) in an effort to achieve a measurable degree of cost savings over time.

It is important to note that a reduction in the shareholder quorum requirement only reduces the number of shareholders that must be present in order for a valid vote to be taken.  This proposal does not change the percentage of votes needed to approve a matter after a quorum has been achieved. Also, for certain approvals, such as the approval of investment advisory contracts, the 1940 Act may require more than one-third of shareholders to be present.  This proposal will not reduce the quorum requirement below the levels specifically required by the 1940 Act.

In considering whether to recommend that shareholders of the Funds that are a series of SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT vote to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement for their Fund’s Trust from a majority to one-third (33-1/3%), the Board primarily considered the cost to the Funds of proxy voting and the potential savings that Funds may achieve over time by reducing the shareholder quorum requirement.

If a majority of voting shareholders of the Funds that are a series of SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT do not vote to amend the Agreement and Declaration of Trust for their respective Trust to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement, the shareholder quorum requirement for that Trust or those Trusts will remain a majority until such time as shareholders of the Funds of that Trust vote to change the requirement.

THE BOARD, INCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES, UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 2.

11



Shares Outstanding and Voting Authority of SIMC

As of [October 16], 2015, SIMC was believed to possess voting authority with respect to approximately [XX] ([XX]%) of the outstanding shares of SIMT, approximately [XX] ([XX]%) of the outstanding shares of SIT, approximately [XX] ([XX]%) of the outstanding shares of SIIT, approximately [XX] ([XX]%) of the outstanding shares of STET, approximately [XX] ([XX]%) of the outstanding shares of SDIT and approximately [XX] ([XX]%) of the outstanding shares of SAAT.

The tables below provide a listing of the breakdown of outstanding shares for each Fund within the Trusts for which SIMC was believed to possess voting authority as of the Record Date.

SIMT

 

SEI INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS TRUSTName of Fund

Number of
Shares
Outstanding

Number of
Shares with
Voting
Authority

Percentage of the Fund

Large Cap Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Large Cap Value Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Large Cap Growth Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Tax-Managed Large Cap Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

S&P 500 Index Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Small Cap Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Small Cap Value Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Small Cap Growth Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Mid-Cap Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

U.S. Managed Volatility Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Global Managed Volatility Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Real Estate Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Enhanced Income Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Core Fixed Income Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

U.S. Fixed Income Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

High Yield Bond Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Real Return Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Long/Short Alternative Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Multi-Asset Accumulation Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Multi-Asset Income Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

SIT

 

To appoint LSV Asset Management as a sub-adviserName of Fund

Number of
Shares
Outstanding

Number of
Shares with
Voting
Authority

Percentage of the Fund and to approve a sub-advisory agreement between SIMC and LSV Asset Management with respect to the Fund.

International Equity Fund

 

o

FOR

o

AGAINST

o

ABSTAIN

XX

XX

XX

%

International Fixed Income Fund

 

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Trustees, which unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the proposal listed above.XX

XX

XX

%

Emerging Markets Equity Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Emerging Markets Debt Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

12



SIIT

 

Please sign, date and returnName of Fund

Number of
Shares
Outstanding

Number of
Shares with
Voting
Authority

Percentage of the proxy card promptly using the enclosed envelope.Fund

Large Cap Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Large Cap Diversified Alpha Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Large Cap Disciplined Equity Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Large Cap Index Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

S&P 500 Index Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Extended Market Index Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Small Cap Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Small Cap II Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

U.S. Managed Volatility Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

World Equity Ex-US Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Screened World Equity Ex-US Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Emerging Markets Equity Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Opportunistic Income Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Core Fixed Income Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

High Yield Bond Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Long Duration Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Long Duration Credit Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Ultra Short Duration Bond Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Emerging Markets Debt Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Real Return Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Limited Duration Bond Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Multi-Asset Real Return Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Intermediate Duration Credit Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

STET

 

Signature(s) should be exactly as name or names appearingName of Fund

Number of
Shares
Outstanding

Number of
Shares with
Voting
Authority

Percentage of the Fund

Intermediate-Term Municipal Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Short Duration Municipal Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

California Municipal Bond Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

New York Municipal Bond Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Tax-Advantaged Income Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Institutional Tax Free Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Tax Free Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

SDIT

Name of Fund

Number of
Shares
Outstanding

Number of
Shares with
Voting
Authority

Percentage of the Fund

Money Market Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Prime Obligation Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Government Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Government II Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Treasury Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Treasury II Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Ultra Short Duration Bond Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Short-Duration Government Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Intermediate-Duration Government Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

GNMA Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

13



SAAT

Name of Fund

Number of
Shares
Outstanding

Number of
Shares with
Voting
Authority

Percentage of the Fund

Defensive Strategy Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Defensive Strategy Allocation Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Conservative Strategy Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Conservative Strategy Allocation Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Moderate Strategy Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Moderate Strategy Allocation Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Aggressive Strategy Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Tax-Managed Aggressive Strategy Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Core Market Strategy Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Core Market Strategy Allocation Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Market Growth Strategy Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

Market Growth Strategy Allocation Fund

XX

XX

XX

%

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) serves as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Trusts.  Representatives of KPMG are not expected to be present at the Meeting, but have been given an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available should any matter arise requiring their presence.

Audit Fees.  Below are the aggregate fees billed for each Trust’s last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by KPMG for the audit of the respective Trust’s annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by KPMG in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those years.  These services include the audits of the financial statements of the each Trust, issuance of consents, income tax provision procedures and assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC.

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

SIMT

 

N/A

 

$

693,000

 

$

691,000

 

SIT

 

N/A

 

$

200,500

 

$

213,500

 

SIIT

 

$

814,500

 

$

693,000

 

N/A

 

STET

 

N/A

 

$

199,500

 

$

199,500

 

SDIT

 

$

197,000

 

$

190,000

 

N/A

 

SAAT

 

$

121,500

 

$

119,500

 

N/A

 

Audit-Related Fees.  Below are the fees billed to each Trust for the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by KPMG that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the each Trust’s financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees” above (together, “Audit-Related Services”).  In addition, the Audit Committee pre-approves KPMG’s engagement for audit-related services to be provided to SIMC and certain entities controlling, controlled by, or under common control with SIMC that provide ongoing services to the Funds, which engagements relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Funds. Any such fees are included in the table below.

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

SIMT

 

N/A

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

SIT

 

N/A

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

SIIT

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

N/A

 

STET

 

N/A

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

SDIT

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

N/A

 

SAAT

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

N/A

 

14



Tax Fees.  Below are the aggregate fees billed for each Trust’s last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by KPMG for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning (together, “Tax-Related Services”).  The Tax-Related Services provided by KPMG related to the review of each Trust’s federal and state income tax returns, excise tax calculations and returns, a review of each Trust’s calculations of capital gain and income distributions, and additional tax research for compliance purposes.

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

SIMT

 

N/A

 

$

0

 

$

28,000

 

SIT

 

N/A

 

$

0

 

$

28,000

 

SIIT

 

$

0

 

$

28,000

 

N/A

 

STET

 

N/A

 

$

23,000

 

$

31,000

 

SDIT

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

N/A

 

SAAT

 

$

0

 

$

28,000

 

N/A

 

None of the services described above were approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

Aggregate Non-Audit Fees.  Below are the aggregate non-audit fees billed for each Trust’s last two fiscal years by KPMG for services rendered to the Trusts and the Adviser.

Adviser
and
Affiliated
Service
Providers

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

SIMT

 

N/A

 

$

240,350

 

$

237,000

 

SIT

 

N/A

 

$

240,350

 

$

237,000

 

SIIT

 

$

240,350

 

$

237,000

 

N/A

 

STET

 

N/A

 

$

237,000

 

$

237,000

 

SDIT

 

$

240,350

 

$

237,000

 

N/A

 

SAAT

 

$

240,350

 

$

237,000

 

N/A

 

All Other Fees.  [There were no fees billed to the Funds in each Trust’s last two fiscal years for other products and services by KPMG, other than the services reported above (together, “Other Fees”).  With respect to engagements that related directly to the operations or financial reporting of the Trusts, KPMG did not bill the Adviser or the Affiliated Service Providers for Other Fees in each Trust’s last two fiscal years.]

Board Consideration of Non-Audit Services.  The Audit Committee has considered whether KPMG’s provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the Adviser and Affiliated Service Providers that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining KPMG’s independence.

OTHER MATTERS

The Board is not aware of any matters that will be presented for action at the Meeting other than the matters set forth herein.  Should any other matters requiring a vote of shareholders arise, the proxy in the accompanying form will confer upon the person or persons entitled to vote the shares represented by such proxy the discretionary authority to vote the shares as to any such other matters in accordance with their best judgment in the interest of the Trusts and each Fund, as applicable.

15



INFORMATION ABOUT SERVICE PROVIDERS

Investment Adviser

SIMC serves as the investment adviser to the Funds.  SIMC is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SEI Investments Company (“SEI”).  The principal executive offices of SIMC and SEI are One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456.

Principal Underwriter

SEI Investments Distribution Company (“SIDCO”) serves as the principal underwriter of the Funds.  The principal executive office of SIDCO is located at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456.

Administrator and Transfer Agent

SEI Investments Global Funds Services (the “Administrator”) serves as the administrator and transfer agent for the Funds. The principal executive office of the Administrator is located at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456.

VOTING INFORMATION

Required Vote

With respect to Proposal 1, election of the Nominees requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the shares voted.

With respect to Proposal 2, the amendment to the quorum provision in each Trust’s Agreement and Declaration of Trust requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote (i.e., more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Trust).

If only one proposal is approved by the shareholders of a Trust, the Trust will implement the proposal that was approved. The approval of one proposal is not contingent upon the approval of the other proposal.

Quorum

In order to act upon the Proposal(s), a quorum is required to be present at the Meeting.  With respect to SIIT and SAAT, the presence of one-third of the shares of the Funds of each of SIIT and SAAT entitled to vote in person or by proxy shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Meeting for such Trusts.  With respect to SIMT, SIT, STET and SDIT, the presence of a majority of the shares of the Funds of each Trust entitled to vote in person or by proxy shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Meeting for such Trust.

Abstentions and “broker non-votes” (i.e., proxies received from brokers indicating that they have not received instructions from the beneficial owner or other person entitled to vote shares) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Meeting.  However, abstentions and “broker non-votes” will have the same effect as a vote “against” the Proposal.  Pursuant to certain rules promulgated by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. that govern the voting by broker-dealers, a broker-dealer holding shares of record for a beneficial owner may not exercise discretionary voting power with respect to certain non-routine matters.  It is anticipated that such broker-dealers will not have

16



discretionary authority to vote on the Proposals.  The absence of instructions from the beneficial owner will result in a “broker non-vote” with respect to the Proposal.

Adjournment

If a quorum is not present at the Meeting, or if a quorum is present but sufficient votes in favor of a Proposal are not received by the time scheduled for the Meeting, the persons named as proxies may propose one or more adjournments of the Meeting for a period or periods to permit further solicitation of proxies.  If a quorum is present at the Meeting, any such adjournment will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the question, in person or by proxy, at the session of the Meeting to be adjourned.  The persons named as proxies will vote in favor of such adjournment those proxies that they are entitled to vote in favor of the Proposal(s).  They will vote against any such adjournment those proxies required to be voted against the Proposal(s).  The Funds will bear the costs of any additional solicitation and any adjourned sessions.

Voting

Shares represented by duly executed proxies will be voted at the Meeting in accordance with the instructions given. However, if no instructions are specified on the proxy with respect to the Proposal(s), shares will be voted FOR the approval of the Proposal(s) and in accordance with the judgment of the persons appointed as proxies upon any other matter that may properly come before the Meeting.  If you wish to participate in the Meeting, you may submit the proxy card included with this Proxy Statement or attend in person.  Your vote is important no matter how many shares you own.  You can vote easily and quickly by telephone, Internet, mail or in person at the Meeting.  Should you require additional information regarding the proxy or replacement proxy cards, you may contact each Trust at 1-800-DIAL-SEI.

Revocation

A shareholder may revoke a previously submitted proxy at any time prior to the Meeting by (i) a written revocation, which must be signed and include the shareholder’s name and account number, received by the Secretary of the Trusts at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456; (ii) properly executing a later-dated proxy; or (iii) attending the Meeting and voting in person.

OTHER INFORMATION

Solicitation of Proxies, Payment of Expenses

The solicitation of proxies is being made on behalf of the Board, on behalf of the Funds.  The Funds have retained Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (the “Proxy Solicitor”) to aid in the solicitation.  The costs of retaining the Proxy Solicitor and other expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation of proxies will be paid by the Funds.  The anticipated cost associated with the solicitation of proxies by the Proxy Solicitor is approximately [$XX] plus any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the Proxy Solicitor.  Proxies may be solicited by mail, electronically, by telephone, fax, in person or by other means, and representatives of the Proxy Solicitor, each Trust, SIMC, the Administrator and SEI may participate in the solicitation of proxies.

The Funds will pay all expenses related to conducting this proxy, including, but not limited to, preparation, printing and mailing of this Proxy Statement and its enclosures, legal fees, and solicitation costs.  The Trusts estimate these costs to be approximately [$XX].  The

17



payment of such fees will be considered an extraordinary expense for the Funds and, therefore, will not be subject to any expense limitation or reimbursement agreement in effect for the Funds.

Shareholders Sharing the Same Address

If two or more shareholders share the same address, only one copy of this Proxy Statement is being delivered to that address, unless the applicable Trust has received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders at that shared address.  Upon written or oral request, the applicable Trust, will deliver promptly a separate copy of this Proxy Statement to a shareholder at a shared address.  Please note that each shareholder will receive a separate proxy card, regardless of whether he or she resides at a shared address.  Please call 1-800-DIAL-SEI or forward a written request to the applicable Trust, One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456 if you would like to (1) receive a separate copy of this Proxy Statement; (2) receive your annual reports, semi-annual reports or proxy statements separately in the future; or (3) request delivery of a single copy of annual reports, semi-annual reports or proxy statements if you are currently receiving multiple copies at a shared address.

Shareholder Proposals

Each Trust is organized as business trusts under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.  As such, each Trust is not required to, and does not, have annual meetings, except to the extent that such meetings are required under the 1940 Act or state law.  Shareholders who wish to submit proposals for inclusion in the proxy statement for a future shareholder meeting should send their written proposals to the Secretary of the Trusts at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456 within a reasonable time before such meeting.  Submission of a proposal does not necessarily mean that such proposal will be included in the Trust’s proxy statement since inclusion in the proxy statement is subject to compliance with certain federal regulations.

Communications with the Board

Shareholders wishing to submit written communications to the Board should send their communications to the Secretary of the Trusts at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456. Any such communications received will be reviewed by the Board at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

Beneficial Ownership of Shares and Security Ownership of Management

Appendix A to this Proxy Statement contains information about the beneficial ownership by shareholders of five percent (5%) or more of the Funds’ outstanding shares as of the Record Date.

The Trusts have delegated to SIMC the authority to vote proxies on the securities held in the Funds’ portfolios.  Accordingly, SIMC will have voting authority if any shares of the Funds are held by another SEI Fund.  The Trusts have been advised by SIMC that any shares of the Funds over which SIMC has voting power will be voted in the same proportion as the vote of all other shareholders of the Funds.  Information regarding the amount of voting power believed to be possessed by SIMC as of the Record Date and the amount of ownership of the Funds by executive officers and Trustees is set forth above.

Other Business

The Board does not intend to present any other business at the Meeting.  If any other matter may properly come before the Meeting, or any adjournment(s) thereof, the persons named in the accompanying proxy

18



card intend to vote, act, or consent thereunder in accordance with their best judgment at that time with respect to such matters unless such proxy contains specific restrictions to the contrary.

Annual Report to Shareholders

For a free copy of each Trust’s most recent annual report and most recent semi-annual report succeeding the annual report, shareholders of the Funds may call 1-800-DIAL-SEI or write to the Funds at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, PA 19456.

THE BOARD, INCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES, UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” EACH PROPOSAL.

PROMPT EXECUTION AND RETURN OF THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IS REQUESTED.  A SELF-ADDRESSED, POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE.  YOU MAY ALSO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR ON THE INTERNET.  ANY UNMARKED PROXIES WITHOUT INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CONTRARY WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR OF APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSAL.

19



EXHIBIT A

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SHARES OF THE FUNDS

5% Shareholders.  As of the Record Date, the following persons were the only persons who were record owners or, to the knowledge of the Funds, were beneficial owners of 5% or more of the Funds’ outstanding shares. The Funds believe that most of the shares referred to in the table below were held by the below persons in accounts for their fiduciary, agency, or custodial customers.

SIMT

Name of Fund

Amount of
Shares

Percent of
Share Class

Nature of Ownership

Large Cap Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Large Cap Value Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Large Cap Growth Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Tax-Managed Large Cap Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

S&P 500 Index Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Small Cap Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Small Cap Value Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Small Cap Growth Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Mid-Cap Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

U.S. Managed Volatility Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Global Managed Volatility Fund

A-1



[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Real Estate Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Enhanced Income Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Core Fixed Income Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

U.S. Fixed Income Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

High Yield Bond Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Real Return Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Long/Short Alternative Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Multi-Asset Accumulation Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Multi-Asset Income Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

2



SIT

Name of Fund

Amount of
Shares

Percent of
Share Class

Nature of Ownership

International Equity Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

International Fixed Income Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Emerging Markets Equity Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Emerging Markets Debt Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

SIIT

Name of Fund

Amount of
Shares

Percent of
Share Class

Nature of Ownership

Large Cap Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Large Cap Diversified Alpha Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Large Cap Disciplined Equity Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Large Cap Index Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

S&P 500 Index Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Extended Market Index Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Small Cap Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Small Cap II Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

3



[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

U.S. Managed Volatility Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

World Equity Ex-US Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Screened World Equity Ex-US Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Emerging Markets Equity Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Opportunistic Income Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Core Fixed Income Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

High Yield Bond Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Long Duration Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Long Duration Credit Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Ultra Short Duration Bond Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Emerging Markets Debt Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Real Return Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Limited Duration Bond Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Multi-Asset Real Return Fund

4



[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Intermediate Duration Credit Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

STET

Name of Fund

Amount of
Shares

Percent of
Share Class

Nature of Ownership

Intermediate-Term Municipal Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Short Duration Municipal Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

California Municipal Bond Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

New York Municipal Bond Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Tax-Advantaged Income Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Institutional Tax Free Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Tax Free Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

SDIT

Name of Fund

Amount of
Shares

Percent of 
Share Class

Nature of Ownership

Money Market Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

5



[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Prime Obligation Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Government Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Government II Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Treasury Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Treasury II Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Ultra Short Duration Bond Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Short-Duration Government Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Intermediate-Duration Government Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

GNMA Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

SAAT

Name of Fund

Amount of
Shares

Percent of
Share Class

Nature of Ownership

Defensive Strategy Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Defensive Strategy Allocation Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Conservative Strategy Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Conservative Strategy Allocation Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Moderate Strategy Fund

6



[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Moderate Strategy Allocation Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Aggressive Strategy Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Tax-Managed Aggressive Strategy Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Core Market Strategy Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Core Market Strategy Allocation Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Market Growth Strategy Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

Market Growth Strategy Allocation Fund

[Investor 1]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 2]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

[Investor 3]

XX

XX

%

[Record]

7



PROXY CARD

SEI INSTITUTIONAL MANAGED TRUST

To Vote by Internet

1) Read the Proxy Statement and have the proxy card below at hand.

2) Go to website www.proxyvote.com

3) Follow the on-line instructions.

To Vote by Telephone

1) Read the Proxy Statement and have the proxy card below at hand.

2) Call [1-800-690-6903]

3) Follow the recorded instructions.

To Vote by Mail

1) Read the Proxy Statement.

2) Check the appropriate box on the proxy card below.

3) Sign and date the proxy card.

4) Return the proxy card in the envelope provided.

If you vote by Telephone or Internet, please do not return your Proxy Card.


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Special Meeting:

The Notice of Special Meeting is available at [www.proxyvote.com.]



SEI INSTITUTIONAL MANAGED TRUST (“SIMT”)

PROXY FOR THE MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS — [January 15], 2016

[Funds]

The undersigned shareholder of the Funds of SIMT, hereby appoints Timothy D. Barto, Esq. the attorney and proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote, as indicated herein, all of the shares of beneficial interest of SIMT standing in the name of the undersigned at the close of business on [October 16,] 2015, at a Special Meeting of Shareholders to be held at the offices of the Trust at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456, at [3:00 p.m.] Eastern Time, on [January 15], 2016, and at any and all adjournments thereof, with all of the powers the undersigned would possess if then and there personally present and especially (but without limiting the general authorization and power hereby given) to vote as indicated on the Proposals, as more fully described in the Proxy Statement for the meeting.

If you sign the proxy without otherwise indicating a vote on a Proposal, this proxy will be voted “FOR” such Proposal(s). As to any other matter that may properly come before the Meeting, the shares will be voted by the proxy in accordance with his judgment. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of the Meeting and the Proxy Statement.


THIS PROXY CARD IS ONLY VALID WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

To vote, mark boxes below in blue or black ink as follows:

Proposal 1:       To elect each of the current Trustees and one new Trustee (individually, a “Nominee” and collectively, the “Nominees”) to the Board of Trustees of the Trusts.

o  FOR

o  AGAINST

o  ABSTAIN

Proposal 2:       To amend the Agreement and Declaration of Trust to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement from a majority to one-third (33 - 1/3%).

o  FOR

o  AGAINST

o  ABSTAIN

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Trustees, which unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the proposal listed above.

Please sign, date and return the proxy card promptly using the enclosed envelope.

Signature(s) should be exactly as name or names appearing on this proxy.  If shares are held jointly, each holder should sign.  If signing is by attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title.  By signing this proxy card, receipt of the Proxy Statement is acknowledged.

 

 

 

 

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

 

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date

 



PROXY CARD

SEI INSTITUTIONAL INTERNATIONAL TRUST

To Vote by Internet

1) Read the Proxy Statement and have the proxy card below at hand.

2) Go to website www.proxyvote.com

3) Follow the on-line instructions.

To Vote by Telephone

1) Read the Proxy Statement and have the proxy card below at hand.

2) Call [1-800-690-6903]

3) Follow the recorded instructions.

To Vote by Mail

1) Read the Proxy Statement.

2) Check the appropriate box on the proxy card below.

3) Sign and date the proxy card.

4) Return the proxy card in the envelope provided.

If you vote by Telephone or Internet, please do not return your Proxy Card.


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Special Meeting:

The Notice of Special Meeting is available at [www.proxyvote.com.]



SEI INSTITUTIONAL INTERNATIONAL TRUST

PROXY FOR THE MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS — [January 15], 2016

[Funds]

The undersigned shareholder of the Funds of SIT, hereby appoints Timothy D. Barto, Esq. the attorney and proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote, as indicated herein, all of the shares of beneficial interest of SIT standing in the name of the undersigned at the close of business on [October 16,] 2015, at a Special Meeting of Shareholders to be held at the offices of the Trust at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456, at [3:00 p.m.] Eastern Time, on [January 15], 2016, and at any and all adjournments thereof, with all of the powers the undersigned would possess if then and there personally present and especially (but without limiting the general authorization and power hereby given) to vote as indicated on the Proposals, as more fully described in the Proxy Statement for the meeting.

If you sign the proxy without otherwise indicating a vote on a Proposal, this proxy will be voted “FOR” such Proposal(s). As to any other matter that may properly come before the Meeting, the shares will be voted by the proxy in accordance with his judgment. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of the Meeting and the Proxy Statement.


THIS PROXY CARD IS ONLY VALID WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

To vote, mark boxes below in blue or black ink as follows:

Proposal 1:       To elect each of the current Trustees and one new Trustee (individually, a “Nominee” and collectively, the “Nominees”) to the Board of Trustees of the Trusts.

o  FOR

o  AGAINST

o  ABSTAIN

Proposal 2:       To amend the Agreement and Declaration of Trust to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement from a majority to one-third (33 - 1/3%).

o  FOR

o  AGAINST

o  ABSTAIN

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Trustees, which unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the proposal listed above.

Please sign, date and return the proxy card promptly using the enclosed envelope.

Signature(s) should be exactly as name or names appearing on this proxy. If shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. If signing is by attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title. By signing this proxy card, receipt of the Proxy Statement is acknowledged.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date



PROXY CARD

SEI INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS TRUST

To Vote by Internet

1) Read the Proxy Statement and have the proxy card below at hand.

2) Go to website www.proxyvote.com

3) Follow the on-line instructions.

To Vote by Telephone

1) Read the Proxy Statement and have the proxy card below at hand.

2) Call [1-800-690-6903]

3) Follow the recorded instructions.

To Vote by Mail

1) Read the Proxy Statement.

2) Check the appropriate box on the proxy card below.

3) Sign and date the proxy card.

4) Return the proxy card in the envelope provided.

If you vote by Telephone or Internet, please do not return your Proxy Card.


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Special Meeting:

The Notice of Special Meeting is available at [www.proxyvote.com.]



SEI INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS TRUST

PROXY FOR THE MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS — [January 15], 2016

[Funds]

The undersigned shareholder of the Funds of SIIT, hereby appoints Timothy D. Barto, Esq. the attorney and proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote, as indicated herein, all of the shares of beneficial interest of SIIT standing in the name of the undersigned at the close of business on [October 16,] 2015, at a Special Meeting of Shareholders to be held at the offices of the Trust at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456, at [3:00 p.m.] Eastern Time, on [January 15], 2016, and at any and all adjournments thereof, with all of the powers the undersigned would possess if then and there personally present and especially (but without limiting the general authorization and power hereby given) to vote as indicated on the Proposal, as more fully described in the Proxy Statement for the meeting.

If you sign the proxy without otherwise indicating a vote on the Proposal, this proxy will be voted “FOR” such Proposal. As to any other matter that may properly come before the Meeting, the shares will be voted by the proxy in accordance with his judgment. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of the Meeting and the Proxy Statement.


THIS PROXY CARD IS ONLY VALID WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

To vote, mark boxes below in blue or black ink as follows:

Proposal:                 To elect each of the current Trustees and one new Trustee (individually, a “Nominee” and collectively, the “Nominees”) to the Board of Trustees of the Trusts.

o  FOR

o  AGAINST

o  ABSTAIN

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Trustees, which unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the proposals listed above.

Please sign, date and return the proxy card promptly using the enclosed envelope.

Signature(s) should be exactly as name or names appearing on this proxy. If shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. If signing is by attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title. By signing this proxy card, receipt of the Proxy Statement is acknowledged.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date



PROXY CARD

SEI TAX EXEMPT TRUST

To Vote by Internet

1) Read the Proxy Statement and have the proxy card below at hand.

2) Go to website www.proxyvote.com

3) Follow the on-line instructions.

To Vote by Telephone

1) Read the Proxy Statement and have the proxy card below at hand.

2) Call [1-800-690-6903]

3) Follow the recorded instructions.

To Vote by Mail

1) Read the Proxy Statement.

2) Check the appropriate box on the proxy card below.

3) Sign and date the proxy card.

4) Return the proxy card in the envelope provided.

If you vote by Telephone or Internet, please do not return your Proxy Card.


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Special Meeting:

The Notice of Special Meeting is available at [www.proxyvote.com.]



SEI TAX EXEMPT TRUST

PROXY FOR THE MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS — [January 15], 2016

[Funds]

The undersigned shareholder of the Funds of STET, hereby appoints Timothy D. Barto, Esq. the attorney and proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote, as indicated herein, all of the shares of beneficial interest of STET standing in the name of the undersigned at the close of business on [October 16,] 2015, at a Special Meeting of Shareholders to be held at the offices of the Trust at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456, at [3:00 p.m.] Eastern Time, on [January 15], 2016, and at any and all adjournments thereof, with all of the powers the undersigned would possess if then and there personally present and especially (but without limiting the general authorization and power hereby given) to vote as indicated on the Proposals, as more fully described in the Proxy Statement for the meeting.

If you sign the proxy without otherwise indicating a vote on a Proposal, this proxy will be voted “FOR” such Proposal(s). As to any other matter that may properly come before the Meeting, the shares will be voted by the proxy in accordance with his judgment. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of the Meeting and the Proxy Statement.


THIS PROXY CARD IS ONLY VALID WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

To vote, mark boxes below in blue or black ink as follows:

Proposal 1:       To elect each of the current Trustees and one new Trustee (individually, a “Nominee” and collectively, the “Nominees”) to the Board of Trustees of the Trusts.

o  FOR

o  AGAINST

o  ABSTAIN

Proposal 2:       To amend the Agreement and Declaration of Trust to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement from a majority to one-third (33 - 1/3%).

o  FOR

o  AGAINST

o  ABSTAIN

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Trustees, which unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the proposal listed above.

Please sign, date and return the proxy card promptly using the enclosed envelope.

Signature(s) should be exactly as name or names appearing on this proxy.  If shares are held jointly, each holder should sign.  If signing is by attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title.  By signing this proxy card, receipt of the Proxy Statement is acknowledged.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date



PROXY CARD

SEI DAILY INCOME TRUST

To Vote by Internet

1) Read the Proxy Statement and have the proxy card below at hand.

2) Go to website www.proxyvote.com

3) Follow the on-line instructions.

To Vote by Telephone

1) Read the Proxy Statement and have the proxy card below at hand.

2) Call [1-800-690-6903]

3) Follow the recorded instructions.

To Vote by Mail

1) Read the Proxy Statement.

2) Check the appropriate box on the proxy card below.

3) Sign and date the proxy card.

4) Return the proxy card in the envelope provided.

If you vote by Telephone or Internet, please do not return your Proxy Card.


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Special Meeting:

The Notice of Special Meeting is available at [www.proxyvote.com.]



SEI DAILY INCOME TRUST

PROXY FOR THE MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS — [January 15], 2016

[Funds]

The undersigned shareholder of the Funds of SDIT, hereby appoints Timothy D. Barto, Esq. the attorney and proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote, as indicated herein, all of the shares of beneficial interest of SDIT standing in the name of the undersigned at the close of business on [October 16,] 2015, at a Special Meeting of Shareholders to be held at the offices of the Trust at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456, at [3:00 p.m.] Eastern Time, on [January 15], 2016, and at any and all adjournments thereof, with all of the powers the undersigned would possess if then and there personally present and especially (but without limiting the general authorization and power hereby given) to vote as indicated on the Proposals, as more fully described in the Proxy Statement for the meeting.

If you sign the proxy without otherwise indicating a vote on a Proposal, this proxy will be voted “FOR” such Proposal(s). As to any other matter that may properly come before the Meeting, the shares will be voted by the proxy in accordance with his judgment. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of the Meeting and the Proxy Statement.


THIS PROXY CARD IS ONLY VALID WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

To vote, mark boxes below in blue or black ink as follows:

Proposal 1:       To elect each of the current Trustees and one new Trustee (individually, a “Nominee” and collectively, the “Nominees”) to the Board of Trustees of the Trusts.

o  FOR

o  AGAINST

o  ABSTAIN

Proposal 2:       To amend the Agreement and Declaration of Trust to reduce the shareholder quorum requirement from a majority to one-third (33 - 1/3%).

o  FOR

o  AGAINST

o  ABSTAIN

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Trustees, which unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the proposal listed above.

Please sign, date and return the proxy card promptly using the enclosed envelope.

Signature(s) should be exactly as name or names appearing on this proxy.  If shares are held jointly, each holder should sign.  If signing is by attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title.  By signing this proxy card, receipt of the Proxy Statement is acknowledged.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date



PROXY CARD

SEI ASSET ALLOCATION TRUST

To Vote by Internet

1) Read the Proxy Statement and have the proxy card below at hand.

2) Go to website www.proxyvote.com

3) Follow the on-line instructions.

To Vote by Telephone

1) Read the Proxy Statement and have the proxy card below at hand.

2) Call [1-800-690-6903]

3) Follow the recorded instructions.

To Vote by Mail

1) Read the Proxy Statement.

2) Check the appropriate box on the proxy card below.

3) Sign and date the proxy card.

4) Return the proxy card in the envelope provided.

If you vote by Telephone or Internet, please do not return your Proxy Card.


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Special Meeting:

The Notice of Special Meeting is available at [www.proxyvote.com.]



SEI ASSET ALLOCATION TRUST

PROXY FOR THE MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS — [January 15], 2016

[Funds]

The undersigned shareholder of the Funds of SAAT, hereby appoints Timothy D. Barto, Esq. the attorney and proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote, as indicated herein, all of the shares of beneficial interest of SAAT standing in the name of the undersigned at the close of business on [October 16,] 2015, at a Special Meeting of Shareholders to be held at the offices of the Trust at One Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456, at [3:00 p.m.] Eastern Time, on [January 15], 2016, and at any and all adjournments thereof, with all of the powers the undersigned would possess if then and there personally present and especially (but without limiting the general authorization and power hereby given) to vote as indicated on the Proposal, as more fully described in the Proxy Statement for the meeting.

If you sign the proxy without otherwise indicating a vote on the Proposal, this proxy will be voted “FOR” such Proposal. As to any other matter that may properly come before the Meeting, the shares will be voted by the proxy in accordance with his judgment. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of the Meeting and the Proxy Statement.


THIS PROXY CARD IS ONLY VALID WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

To vote, mark boxes below in blue or black ink as follows:

Proposal:                 To elect each of the current Trustees and one new Trustee (individually, a “Nominee” and collectively, the “Nominees”) to the Board of Trustees of the Trusts.

o  FOR

o  AGAINST

o  ABSTAIN

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Trustees, which unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the proposal listed above.

Please sign, date and return the proxy card promptly using the enclosed envelope.

Signature(s) should be exactly as name or names appearing on this proxy.  If shares are held jointly, each holder should sign.  If signing is by attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title.  By signing this proxy card, receipt of the Proxy Statement is acknowledged.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date